Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37431030›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Red and Processed Meat Consumption in Poland.

Katarzyna Stoś, Ewa Rychlik, Agnieszka Woźniak, Maciej Ołtarzewski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katarzyna StośNational Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5186-7726
Ewa RychlikNational Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9981-6015
Agnieszka WoźniakNational Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3684-8586
Maciej OłtarzewskiNational Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5399-1712
Narodowy Instytut Zdrowia Publicznego PZH – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy · PL

Funding

European Food Safety Authority OC/EFSA/DATA/2015/03 CT 3Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education 3876/E-220/S/2018-1the National Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute project FŻ-1/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the quantity and frequency of meat consumption, especially of red and processed meat, in Poland. The amount of meat consumed was assessed using data from household budget surveys undertaken in 2000, 2010, and 2020. The frequency of consumption was assessed using Food Propensity Questionnaire data from 1831 adults in 2019-2020. Poles consumed 1.35 kg of unprocessed red meat and 1.96 kg of total processed meat per person per month in 2020. The consumption of red meat was lower than in the two previous decades; the consumption of processed meat fluctuated. Pork was the most commonly consumed red meat: 40% of adults consumed pork 2-3 times a week. Beef and other unprocessed red meat were most often consumed less than once a month (29.1%). Processed meat was often consumed: 37.8% of adults ate cold cuts, and 34.9% ate sausages and bacon 2-3 times a week. The consumption of red and processed meat in Poland was high and frequent. In particular, the consumption of processed meat exceeded the recommendations and might increase the risk of chronic diseases. It is necessary to implement activities aimed at reducing the consumption of red and processed meat in Poland.

Indexed as

adultsamount and frequency of consumptionhouseholdsprocessed meatred meat

Identifiers

PMID37431030
PMCPMC9601906
OpenAlexW4306918976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.