Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37430851›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Optical Remote Sensing in Provisioning of Ecosystem-Functions Analysis-Review.

Pavel Vyvlečka, Vilém Pechanec

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pavel VyvlečkaDepartment of Geoinformatics, Faculty of Science, Palacky University, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9622-3388
Vilém PechanecDepartment of Geoinformatics, Faculty of Science, Palacky University, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6728-6646

Funding

Internal Grant Agency of Palacký University Olomouc IGA_PrF_2023_017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keeping natural ecosystems and their functions in the proper condition is necessary. One of the best contactless monitoring methods is remote sensing, especially optical remote sensing, which is used for vegetation applications. In addition to satellite data, data from ground sensors are necessary for validation or training in ecosystem-function quantification. This article focuses on the ecosystem functions associated with aboveground-biomass production and storage. The study contains an overview of the remote-sensing methods used for ecosystem-function monitoring, especially methods for detecting primary variables linked to ecosystem functions. The related studies are summarized in multiple tables. Most studies use freely available Sentinel-2 or Landsat imagery, with Sentinel-2 mostly producing better results at larger scales and in areas with vegetation. The spatial resolution is a key factor that plays a significant role in the accuracy with which ecosystem functions are quantified. However, factors such as spectral bands, algorithm selection, and validation data are also important. In general, optical data are usable even without supplementary data.

Indexed as

ecosystem functionecosystem serviceoptical sensorsremote sensing

Identifiers

PMID37430851
PMCPMC10223914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.