Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37430815›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

An Online Anomaly Detection Approach for Fault Detection on Fire Alarm Systems.

Emanuel Sousa Tomé, Rita P Ribeiro, Inês Dutra, Arlete Rodrigues

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emanuel Sousa ToméComputer Science Department, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7861-9012
Rita P RibeiroComputer Science Department, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6852-8077
Inês DutraComputer Science Department, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3578-7769
Arlete RodriguesBosch Security Systems, 3880-728 Ovar, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The early detection of fire is of utmost importance since it is related to devastating threats regarding human lives and economic losses. Unfortunately, fire alarm sensory systems are known to be prone to failures and frequent false alarms, putting people and buildings at risk. In this sense, it is essential to guarantee smoke detectors' correct functioning. Traditionally, these systems have been subject to periodic maintenance plans, which do not consider the state of the fire alarm sensors and are, therefore, sometimes carried out not when necessary but according to a predefined conservative schedule. Intending to contribute to designing a predictive maintenance plan, we propose an online data-driven anomaly detection of smoke sensors that model the behaviour of these systems over time and detect abnormal patterns that can indicate a potential failure. Our approach was applied to data collected from independent fire alarm sensory systems installed with four customers, from which about three years of data are available. For one of the customers, the obtained results were promising, with a precision score of 1 with no false positives for 3 out of 4 possible faults. Analysis of the remaining customers' results highlighted possible reasons and potential improvements to address this problem better. These findings can provide valuable insights for future research in this area.

Indexed as

anomaly detectionbig datadata streamsfire alarm systemsindustry 4.0machine learningpredictive maintenancetime series

Identifiers

PMID37430815
PMCPMC10221465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.