ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Automatic Identification of Ultrasound Images of the Tibial Nerve in Different Ankle Positions Using Deep Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Masked autoencoder pretraining for peripheral nerve segmentation in ultrasound images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Automated segmentation and quantitative measurement of cervical nerves in ultrasound images using an SZJ-SEG-based deep learning framework.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral nerve tension is known to be related to the pathophysiology of neuropathy; however, assessing this tension is difficult in a clinical setting. In this study, we aimed to develop a deep learning algorithm for the automatic assessment of tibial nerve tension using B-mode ultrasound imaging. To develop the algorithm, we used 204 ultrasound images of the tibial nerve in three positions: the maximum dorsiflexion position and -10° and -20° plantar flexion from maximum dorsiflexion. The images were taken of 68 healthy volunteers who did not have any abnormalities in the lower limbs at the time of testing. The tibial nerve was manually segmented in all images, and 163 cases were automatically extracted as the training dataset using U-Net. Additionally, convolutional neural network (CNN)-based classification was performed to determine each ankle position. The automatic classification was validated using five-fold cross-validation from the testing data composed of 41 data points. The highest mean accuracy (0.92) was achieved using manual segmentation. The mean accuracy of the full auto-classification of the tibial nerve at each ankle position was more than 0.77 using five-fold cross-validation. Thus, the tension of the tibial nerve can be accurately assessed with different dorsiflexion angles using an ultrasound imaging analysis with U-Net and a CNN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.