ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Exploring Transformer and Graph Convolutional Networks for Human Mobility Modeling.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An explainable dual-attention transformer for predicting the sociocultural impact of global sports events.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- GTasm: a genome assembly method using graph transformers and HiFi reads.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The estimation of human mobility patterns is essential for many components of developed societies, including the planning and management of urbanization, pollution, and disease spread. One important type of mobility estimator is the next-place predictors, which use previous mobility observations to anticipate an individual's subsequent location. So far, such predictors have not yet made use of the latest advancements in artificial intelligence methods, such as General Purpose Transformers (GPT) and Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs), which have already achieved outstanding results in image analysis and natural language processing. This study explores the use of GPT- and GCN-based models for next-place prediction. We developed the models based on more general time series forecasting architectures and evaluated them using two sparse datasets (based on check-ins) and one dense dataset (based on continuous GPS data). The experiments showed that GPT-based models slightly outperformed the GCN-based models with a difference in accuracy of 1.0 to 3.2 percentage points (p.p.). Furthermore, Flashback-LSTM-a state-of-the-art model specifically designed for next-place prediction on sparse datasets-slightly outperformed the GPT-based and GCN-based models on the sparse datasets (1.0 to 3.5 p.p. difference in accuracy). However, all three approaches performed similarly on the dense dataset. Given that future use cases will likely involve dense datasets provided by GPS-enabled, always-connected devices (e.g., smartphones), the slight advantage of Flashback on the sparse datasets may become increasingly irrelevant. Given that the performance of the relatively unexplored GPT- and GCN-based solutions was on par with state-of-the-art mobility prediction models, we see a significant potential for them to soon surpass today's state-of-the-art approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.