ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Pedestrian Localization with Stride-Wise Error Estimation and Compensation by Fusion of UWB and IMU Data.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Using the LSTM Neural Network and the UWB Positioning System to Predict the Position of Low and High Speed Moving Objects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Indoor positioning enables mobile machines to perform tasks (semi-)automatically, such as following an operator. However, the usefulness and safety of these applications depends on the reliability of the estimated operator localization. Thus, quantifying the accuracy of positioning at runtime is critical for the application in real-world industrial contexts. In this paper, we present a method that produces an estimate of the current positioning error for each user stride. To accomplish this, we construct a virtual stride vector from Ultra-Wideband (UWB) position measurements. The virtual vectors are then compared to stride vectors from a foot-mounted Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU). Using these independent measurements, we estimate the current reliability of the UWB measurements. Positioning errors are mitigated through loosely coupled filtering of both vector types. We evaluate our method in three environments, showing that it improves positioning accuracy, especially in challenging conditions with obstructed line of sight and sparse UWB infrastructure. Additionally, we demonstrate the mitigation of simulated spoofing attacks on UWB positioning. Our findings indicate that positioning quality can be judged at runtime by comparing user strides reconstructed from UWB and IMU measurements. Our method is independent of situation- or environment-specific parameter tuning, and as such represents a promising approach for detecting both known and unknown positioning error states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.