ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Efficient Deep Learning Based Hybrid Model to Detect Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Wearable Sensors and Artificial Intelligence for Sleep Apnea Detection: A Systematic Review.Journal of medical systems · 2025Pooled it
- Accuracy of deep learning in diagnosis of apnea syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Integrating physiological signals for enhanced sleep apnea diagnosis with SleepNet.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advances in Machine Learning Prediction Models for the Screening of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults.Nature and science of sleep · 2025Review
- Application of Machine Learning Techniques for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea/Hypopnea Syndrome.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An increasing number of patients and a lack of awareness about obstructive sleep apnea is a point of concern for the healthcare industry. Polysomnography is recommended by health experts to detect obstructive sleep apnea. The patient is paired up with devices that track patterns and activities during their sleep. Polysomnography, being a complex and expensive process, cannot be adopted by the majority of patients. Therefore, an alternative is required. The researchers devised various machine learning algorithms using single lead signals such as electrocardiogram, oxygen saturation, etc., for the detection of obstructive sleep apnea. These methods have low accuracy, less reliability, and high computation time. Thus, the authors introduced two different paradigms for the detection of obstructive sleep apnea. The first is MobileNet V1, and the other is the convergence of MobileNet V1 with two separate recurrent neural networks, Long-Short Term Memory and Gated Recurrent Unit. They evaluate the efficacy of their proposed method using authentic medical cases from the PhysioNet Apnea-Electrocardiogram database. The model MobileNet V1 achieves an accuracy of 89.5%, a convergence of MobileNet V1 with LSTM achieves an accuracy of 90%, and a convergence of MobileNet V1 with GRU achieves an accuracy of 90.29%. The obtained results prove the supremacy of the proposed approach in comparison to the state-of-the-art methods. To showcase the implementation of devised methods in a real-life scenario, the authors design a wearable device that monitors ECG signals and classifies them into apnea and normal. The device employs a security mechanism to transmit the ECG signals securely over the cloud with the consent of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.