Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37430519›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Validation of an Algorithm for Measurement of Sedentary Behaviour in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Khalid Abdul Jabbar, Javad Sarvestan, Rana Zia Ur Rehman, Sue Lord, Ngaire Kerse, Ruth Teh, Silvia Del Din

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Khalid Abdul JabbarSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9620-2875
Javad SarvestanTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8589-2420
Rana Zia Ur RehmanTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Sue LordSchool of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.
Ngaire KerseSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5992-3681
Ruth TehSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7135-1850
Silvia Del DinTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1154-4751

Funding

Innovative Medicines Initiative 820820Innovative Medicines Initiative 853981Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment UOOX1901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate measurement of sedentary behaviour in older adults is informative and relevant. Yet, activities such as sitting are not accurately distinguished from non-sedentary activities (e.g., upright activities), especially in real-world conditions. This study examines the accuracy of a novel algorithm to identify sitting, lying, and upright activities in community-dwelling older people in real-world conditions. Eighteen older adults wore a single triaxial accelerometer with an onboard triaxial gyroscope on their lower back and performed a range of scripted and non-scripted activities in their homes/retirement villages whilst being videoed. A novel algorithm was developed to identify sitting, lying, and upright activities. The algorithm's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for identifying scripted sitting activities ranged from 76.9% to 94.8%. For scripted lying activities: 70.4% to 95.7%. For scripted upright activities: 75.9% to 93.1%. For non-scripted sitting activities: 92.3% to 99.5%. No non-scripted lying activities were captured. For non-scripted upright activities: 94.3% to 99.5%. The algorithm could, at worst, overestimate or underestimate sedentary behaviour bouts by ±40 s, which is within a 5% error for sedentary behaviour bouts. These results indicate good to excellent agreement for the novel algorithm, providing a valid measure of sedentary behaviour in community-dwelling older adults.

Indexed as

Independent LivingSedentary BehaviorAgedAlgorithmsBackHumansSitting Positiondigital healtholder adultsreal-worldsedentary behaviourvalidationwearable device

Identifiers

PMID37430519
PMCPMC10223684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.