Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37430482›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2023

Definition, management, and training in impacted fetal head at cesarean birth: a national survey of maternity professionals.

Katie Cornthwaite, Pauline Hewitt, Jan W van der Scheer, Imogen A F Brown, Jenni Burt, Eliane Dufresne, Mary Dixon-Woods, Tim Draycott, ABC Contributor Group, Thiscovery Authorship Group and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Katie CornthwaiteRoyal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5690-5656
Pauline HewittRoyal College of Midwives, London, UK.
Jan W van der ScheerTHIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4368-0355
Imogen A F BrownTHIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4393-0956
Jenni BurtTHIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0037-274X
Eliane DufresneRAND Europe, Cambridge, UK.
Mary Dixon-WoodsTHIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5915-0041
Tim DraycottRoyal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, London, UK.
ABC Contributor Group
Thiscovery Authorship Group
Rachna BahlRoyal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, London, UK.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBRAND Europe · GBRoyal College of Midwives · GB

Funding

Department of Health and Social Care Avoiding Brain Injury in Child birth (ABC) programDepartment of Health and Social Care Avoiding Brain Injury in Child birth (ABC) programmeHealth Foundation RHZF/001-RG88620National Institute for Health and Care Research Mary Dixon-Woods is an NIHR Senior InvestigatorNational Institute for Health and Care Research NF-SI-0617-10026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study assessed views, understanding and current practices of maternity professionals in relation to impacted fetal head at cesarean birth, with the aim of informing a standardized definition, clinical management approaches and training. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe conducted a survey consultation including the range of maternity professionals who attend emergency cesarean births in the UK. Thiscovery, an online research and development platform, was used to ask closed-ended and free-text questions. Simple descriptive analysis was undertaken for closed-ended responses, and content analysis for categorization and counting of free-text responses. Main outcome measures included the count and percentage of participants selecting predefined options on clinical definition, multi-professional team approach, communication, clinical management and training.

resultsIn total, 419 professionals took part, including 144 midwives, 216 obstetricians and 59 other clinicians (eg anesthetists). We found high levels of agreement on the components of an impacted fetal head definition (79% of obstetricians) and the need for use of a multi-professional approach to management (95% of all participants). Over 70% of obstetricians deemed nine techniques acceptable for management of impacted fetal head, but some obstetricians also considered potentially unsafe practices appropriate. Access to professional training in management of impacted fetal head was highly variable, with over 80% of midwives reporting no training in vaginal disimpaction.

conclusionsThese findings demonstrate agreement on the components of a standardized definition for impacted fetal head, and a need and appetite for multi-professional training. These findings can inform a program of work to improve care, including use of structured management algorithms and simulation-based multi-professional training.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionMidwiferyFemaleHumansPregnancySurveys and Questionnairesbrain injurycesarean birthdisimpactionfetal pillow®impacted fetal headmaternityonlinesurveytrainingvaginal push-up

Identifiers

PMID37430482
PMCPMC10407013
OpenAlexW4383872367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.