Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37430401›Full record

ReviewClinical endoscopy2023

Complications of endoscopic resection in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Takeshi Uozumi, Seiichiro Abe, Mai Ego Makiguchi, Satoru Nonaka, Haruhisa Suzuki, Shigetaka Yoshinaga, Yutaka Saito

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Duodenal mucosal autotransplantation.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Gastric polyps are not created equal: Know your enemy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  13. Insights Into Resection for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. [IDEN Consensus on Management of Antithrombotic Agents in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takeshi UozumiEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Seiichiro AbeEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Mai Ego MakiguchiEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoru NonakaEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruhisa SuzukiEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigetaka YoshinagaEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka SaitoEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
National Cancer Center Hospital East · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic resection (ER) is widely utilized as a minimally invasive treatment for upper gastrointestinal tumors; however, complications could occur during and after the procedure. Post-ER mucosal defect leads to delayed perforation and bleeding; therefore, endoscopic closure methods (endoscopic hand-suturing, the endoloop and endoclip closure method, and over-the-scope clip method) and tissue shielding methods (polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue) are developed to prevent these complications. During duodenal ER, complete closure of the mucosal defect significantly reduces delayed bleeding and should be performed. An extensive mucosal defect that comprises three-quarters of the circumference in the esophagus, gastric antrum, or cardia is a significant risk factor for post-ER stricture. Steroid therapy is considered the first-line option for the prevention of esophageal stricture, but its efficacy for gastric stricture remains unclear. Methods for the prevention and management of ER-related complications in the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum differ according to the organ; therefore, endoscopists should be familiar with ways of preventing and managing organ-specific complications.

Indexed as

ComplicationsEndoscopic mucosal resectionEndoscopic resectionEsophageal stricture

Identifiers

PMID37430401
PMCPMC10393571
OpenAlexW4381435299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.