Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37430308›Full record

SynthesisBMC pulmonary medicine2023

Diagnostic and prognostic value of echocardiography in pulmonary hypertension: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Tian-Xin Dong, Qing Zhu, Shi-Tong Wang, Yong-Huai Wang, Guang-Yuan Li, Fan-Xin Kong, Chun-Yan Ma

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Advances in the imaging of pulmonary hypertension.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tian-Xin DongDepartment of Cardiovascular Ultrasound, The First Hospital of China Medical University, No. 155 Nanjing Bei Street, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning, China.
Qing ZhuDepartment of Cardiovascular Ultrasound, The First Hospital of China Medical University, No. 155 Nanjing Bei Street, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning, China.
Shi-Tong WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Ultrasound, The First Hospital of China Medical University, No. 155 Nanjing Bei Street, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning, China.
Yong-Huai WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Ultrasound, The First Hospital of China Medical University, No. 155 Nanjing Bei Street, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning, China.
Guang-Yuan LiDepartment of Cardiovascular Ultrasound, The First Hospital of China Medical University, No. 155 Nanjing Bei Street, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning, China.
Fan-Xin KongDepartment of Cardiovascular Ultrasound, The First Hospital of China Medical University, No. 155 Nanjing Bei Street, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning, China.
Chun-Yan MaDepartment of Cardiovascular Ultrasound, The First Hospital of China Medical University, No. 155 Nanjing Bei Street, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning, China. cmu1h_mcy@126.com.
China Medical University · CNFirst Hospital of China Medical University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China U21A20387Shenyang Science and Technology Plan 20-205-4-014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of echocardiography in the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been widely studied recently. However, these findings have not undergone normative evaluation and may provide confusing evidence for clinicians. To evaluate and summarize existing evidence, we performed an umbrella review.

methodsSystematic reviews and meta-analyses were searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to September 4, 2022. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR), and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to evaluate the quality of evidence.

resultsThirteen meta-analyses (nine diagnostic and four prognostic studies) were included after searching four databases. The methodological quality of the included studies was rated as high (62%) or moderate (38%) by AMSTAR. The thirteen included meta-analyses involved a total of 28 outcome measures. The quality of evidence for these outcomes were high (7%), moderate (29%), low (39%), and very low (25%) using GRADE methodology. In the detection of PH, the sensitivity of systolic pulmonary arterial pressure is 0.85-0.88, and the sensitivity and specificity of right ventricular outflow tract acceleration time are 0.84. Pericardial effusion, right atrial area, and tricuspid annulus systolic displacement provide prognostic value in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension with hazard ratios between 1.45 and 1.70. Meanwhile, right ventricular longitudinal strain has independent prognostic value in patients with PH, with a hazard ratio of 2.96-3.67.

conclusionThe umbrella review recommends echocardiography for PH detection and prognosis. Systolic pulmonary arterial pressure and right ventricular outflow tract acceleration time can be utilized for detection, while several factors including pericardial effusion, right atrial area, tricuspid annular systolic displacement, and right ventricular longitudinal strain have demonstrated prognostic significance.

trial registrationPROSPERO (CRD42022356091), https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ .

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationHypertension, PulmonaryPericardial EffusionEchocardiographyHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPrognosisSystematic Reviews as TopicDiagnostic valueEchocardiographyPulmonary hypertensionRight ventricular longitudinal strainUmbrella review

Identifiers

PMID37430308
PMCPMC10334642
OpenAlexW4383815557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.