Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37430281›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Necessity of fusion following decompression surgery in patients with single-level lumbar stenosis: study protocol for an open-label multicentre non-inferiority randomized controlled clinical trial.

Andrey Grin, Ivan Lvov, Aleksandr Talypov, Vladimir Smirnov, Anton Kordonskiy, Valeriy Lebedev, Andrey Zuev, Ilya Senko, Iren Pogonchenkova, Vladimir Krylov

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05273879 (Necessity of Fusion Following Decompression Surgery in Patients With Single-level Lumbar Stenosis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 75% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05273879 narecruitingnot on this map

Necessity of Fusion Following Decompression Surgery in Patients With Single-level Lumbar Stenosis: Study Protocol for an Open-label Multicenter Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSklifosovsky Institute of Emergency CareRan2022 to 2026Enrolled86ConditionsLumbar Spinal Stenosis, Spinal Stenosis, Spinal FusionArmsdecompression, fusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrey GrinSklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow, Russia.
Ivan LvovSklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow, Russia. dr.speleolog@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1718-0792
Aleksandr TalypovSklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir SmirnovSklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow, Russia.
Anton KordonskiySklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow, Russia.
Valeriy LebedevPirogov National Medical and Surgical Center, Moscow, Russia.
Andrey ZuevPirogov National Medical and Surgical Center, Moscow, Russia.
Ilya SenkoFederal State Budgetary Institution "Federal Center for Brain and Neurotechnologies" FMBA, Moscow, Russia.
Iren PogonchenkovaMoscow Scientific and Practical Center for Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine, Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir KrylovSklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow, Russia.
Research Institute of Emergency Care · RUNational Medical and Surgical Center named after N.I. Pirogov · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe necessity of spinal segment fusion after decompression is one of the most controversial and unresolved issues in single-level lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. To date, only one trial carried out 15 years ago focused on this problem. The key purpose of the current trial is to compare the long-term clinical results of the two surgical methods (decompression vs. decompression and fusion) in patients with single-level lumbar stenosis.

methodsThis study is focused on the non-inferior clinical results of decompression compared with the standard fusion procedure. In the decompression group, the spinous process, the interspinous and supraspinous ligaments, part of the facet joints, and corresponding parts of the vertebral arch are to be preserved intact. In the fusion group, decompression is to be supplemented with transforaminal interbody fusion. Participants meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomly divided into two equal groups (1:1), depending on the surgical method. The final analysis will include 86 patients (43 per group). The primary endpoint is Oswestry Disability Index dynamics at the end of the 24-month follow-up compared to the baseline level. Secondary outcomes included those estimated using the SF-36 scale, EQ-5D-5L, and psychological scales. Additional parameters will include sagittal balance of the spine, fusion results, total cost of surgery, and hospital stay followed by two-year treatment. Follow-up examinations will be performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months DISCUSSION: Authors suggest that this study will improve the evidence for application of various surgical techniques for lumbar spine stenosis surgery and verify the existing protocol for surgical management.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05273879 . Registered on March 10, 2022.

Indexed as

Neurosurgical ProceduresSpineConstriction, PathologicDecompressionDietary SupplementsEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDecompressionLaminotomyLumbar spinal stenosisRandomized controlled trialSpinal Fusion

Identifiers

PMID37430281
PMCPMC10332049
OpenAlexW4383720822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.