Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37430053›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Double Emulsion Flow Cytometry for Rapid Single Genome Detection.

Thomas Cowell, Hee-Sun Han

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas CowellDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Hee-Sun HanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. hshan@illinois.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Established techniques in droplet microfluidics have utilized single emulsion (SE) drops to compartmentalize and analyze single cells achieving high-throughput, low input analysis. Building upon this foundation, double emulsion (DE) droplet microfluidics has emerged with distinct advantages in terms of stable compartmentalization, resistance to merging, and most importantly direct compatibility with flow cytometry. In this chapter, we describe a simple-to-fabricate, single-layer DE drop generation device that achieves spatial control over surface wetting with a plasma treatment step. This easy-to-operate device allows for the robust production of single-core DEs with excellent control over the monodispersity. We further explain the use of these DE drops for single-molecule and single-cell assays. Detailed protocols are described to perform single molecule detection using droplet digital PCR in DE drops and automated detection of DE drops on a fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS). Due to the wide availability of FACS instruments, DE methods can facilitate the broader adoption of drop-based screening. As the applications of FACS-compatible DE droplets are immensely varied and extend well beyond what can be explored here, this chapter should be seen as an introduction to DE microfluidics.

Indexed as

Biological AssayMicrofluidicsEmulsionsFlow CytometryPlasmaEmulsionsDouble emulsionDroplet digital PCRDroplet microfluidicsFlow cytometryHigh-throughput screening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.