Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37430030›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Dynamic encoding of phonetic categories in zebra finch auditory forebrain.

Wanyi Liu, David S Vicario

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wanyi LiuDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA. wl535@scarletmail.rutgers.edu.
David S VicarioDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA. vicario@psych.rutgers.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vocal communication requires the formation of acoustic categories to enable invariant representations of sounds despite superficial variations. Humans form acoustic categories for speech phonemes, enabling the listener to recognize words independent of speakers; animals can also discriminate speech phonemes. We investigated the neural mechanisms of this process using electrophysiological recordings from the zebra finch secondary auditory area, caudomedial nidopallium (NCM), during passive exposure to human speech stimuli consisting of two naturally spoken words produced by multiple speakers. Analysis of neural distance and decoding accuracy showed improvements in neural discrimination between word categories over the course of exposure, and this improved representation transferred to the same words by novel speakers. We conclude that NCM neurons formed generalized representations of word categories independent of speaker-specific variations that became more refined over the course of passive exposure. The discovery of this dynamic encoding process in NCM suggests a general processing mechanism for forming categorical representations of complex acoustic signals that humans share with other animals.

Indexed as

FinchesPhoneticsAcousticsAnimalsHumansProsencephalonSpeech

Identifiers

PMID37430030
PMCPMC10333302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.