Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37430015›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2023

Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Liver Microwave Ablation Using a Fully Water-Cooled Choke Ring Antenna: First Multicenter Clinical Report.

Maxime Blain, Govindarajan Narayanan, Alexis Ricoeur, Adrian Kobe, Ashwin M Mahendra, Blake Jacks, Quentin Letty, Baptiste Bonnet, Lambros Tselikas, Frederic Deschamps and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Semi-automatic puncture robotic system based on real-time multi-modal image fusion: preclinical evaluation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Semi-automatic robotic puncture system based on deformable soft tissue point cloud registration.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maxime BlainDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France. maxime.blain@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5753-8210
Govindarajan NarayananHerbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Alexis RicoeurInterventional Radiology Unit, Diagnostic Department, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Adrian KobeDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Ashwin M MahendraCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Miami, FL, USA.
Blake JacksCARTI Cancer Center, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Quentin LettyDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France.
Baptiste BonnetDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Lambros TselikasDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Frederic DeschampsDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Thierry de BaèreDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe safety and efficacy of a microwave ablation (MWA) system for the liver with novel technologies in field control, antenna cooling through the inner part of the choke ring, and dual temperature monitoring were evaluated in this multicenter retrospective study. MATERIAL AND

methodsAblation characteristics and efficacy were assessed on follow-up imaging (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging). Safety was evaluated according to CTCAE classification.

resultsEighty-seven liver tumors (65 metastases and 22 hepatocellular carcinomas) measuring 17.8 ± 7.9 mm were treated in 68 patients. Ablation zones measured 35.6 ± 11 mm in longest diameter. The coefficients of variation of the longest and shortest ablation diameters were 30.1% and 26.4%, respectively. The mean sphericity index of the ablation zone was 0.78 ± 0.14. Seventy-one ablations (82%) had a sphericity index above 0.66. At 1 month, all tumors demonstrated complete ablation with margins of 0-5 mm, 5-10 mm, and greater than 10 mm achieved in 22%, 46%, and 31% of tumors, respectively. After a median follow-up of 10 months, local tumor control was achieved in 84.7% of treated tumors after a single ablation and in 86% after one patient received a second ablation. One grade 3 complication (stress ulcer) occurred, but was unrelated to the procedure. Ablation zone size and geometry in this clinical study were in accordance with previously reported in vivo preclinical findings.

conclusionPromising results were reported for this MWA device. The high spherical index, reproducibility, and predictability of the resulting treatment zones translated to a high percentage of adequate safety margins, providing good local control rate.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesCatheter AblationLiver NeoplasmsHumansMicrowavesReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeInterventional oncologyLiver neoplasmsMicrowave ablation

Identifiers

PMID37430015
PMCPMC10382338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.