ArticleBehavior research methods2024
Joint modeling of action sequences and action time in computer-based interactive tasks.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A transition evaluation model with probability-based effectiveness indicators-a new measurement model for problem-solving process data.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Leveraging Distance-Based Effectiveness Indicators for Enhanced Behavioral Pattern Discovery in Complex Problem-Solving Assessment.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Teamwork Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling.Psychometrika · 2025Article
- Analysis of Log Data From an International Online Educational Assessment System: A Multi-State Survival Modeling Approach to Reaction Time Between and Across Action Sequence.Psychometrika · 2025Article
- Investigating the Predictive Performance of Process Data and Result Data in Complex Problem Solving Using the Conditional Gradient Boosting Algorithm.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- Polytomous Effectiveness Indicators in Complex Problem-Solving Tasks and Their Applications in Developing Measurement Model.Psychometrika · 2024Article
- Biclustering of Log Data: Insights from a Computer-Based Complex Problem Solving Assessment.Journal of Intelligence · 2024Article
- Understanding the log file data from educational and psychological computer-based testing: A scoping review protocol.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Process data refers to data recorded in computer-based assessments that reflect the problem-solving processes of participants and provide greater insight into how they solve problems. Action time, namely the amount of time required to complete a state transition, is also included in such data along with actions. In this study, an action-level joint model of action sequences and action time is proposed, in which the sequential response model (SRM) is used as the measurement model for action sequences, and a new log-normal action time model is proposed as the measurement model for action time. The proposed model can be regarded as an extension of the SRM by incorporating action time within the joint-hierarchical modeling framework and as an extension of the conventional item-level joint models in process data analysis. Results of the empirical and simulation studies demonstrated that the model setup was justified, model parameters could be interpreted, parameter estimates were accurate, and taking into account participants' action time further was beneficial for obtaining a deep understanding of participants' behavioral patterns. Overall, the proposed action-level joint model provides an innovative modeling framework for analyzing process data in computer-based assessments from the latent variable modeling perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37429984What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.