Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37429949›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2024

Magnetic resonance imaging of anal cancer: tumor characteristics and early prediction of treatment outcome.

Bettina A Hanekamp, Ellen Viktil, Kathinka S Slørdahl, Johann Baptist Dormagen, Nils E Kløw, Eirik Malinen, Cathrine Brunborg, Marianne G Guren, Anselm Schulz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. MR Imaging of Anal Cancer.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bettina A HanekampDepartment of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway. bethan@ous-hf.no.ORCID 0000-0002-3094-6548
Ellen ViktilDepartment of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.
Kathinka S SlørdahlInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Johann Baptist DormagenDepartment of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.
Nils E KløwDepartment of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.
Eirik MalinenDepartment of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Cathrine BrunborgOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Marianne G GurenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anselm SchulzDepartment of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze tumor characteristics derived from pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) before and during chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and to compare the changes in these characteristics between scans of responders vs. nonresponders to CRT.

methodsWe included 52 patients with a pelvic 3T MRI scan prior to CRT (baseline scan); 39 of these patients received an additional scan during week 2 of CRT (second scan). Volume, diameter, extramural tumor depth (EMTD), and external anal sphincter infiltration (EASI) of the tumor were assessed. Mean, kurtosis, skewness, standard deviation (SD), and entropy values were extracted from apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histograms. The main outcome was locoregional treatment failure. Correlations were evaluated with Wilcoxon's signed rank-sum test and Pearson's correlation coefficient, quantile regression, univariate logistic regression, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) analyses.

resultsIn isolated analyses of the baseline and second MRI scans, none of the characteristics were associated with outcome. Comparison between the scans showed significant changes in several characteristics: volume, diameter, EMTD, and ADC skewness decreased in the second scan, although the mean ADC increased. Small decreases in volume and diameter were associated with treatment failure, and these variables had the highest AUC values (0.73 and 0.76, respectively) among the analyzed characteristics.

conclusionChanges in tumor volume and diameter in an early scan during CRT could represent easily assessable imaging-based biomarkers to eliminate the need for analysis of more complex MRI characteristics.

Indexed as

Anus NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnal cancerArea under the curveBiomarkerChemoradiotherapyDiffusion magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID37429949
PMCPMC10784345
OpenAlexW4383753797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.