Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37429904›Full record

ReviewNature ecology & evolution2023

Conceptual and empirical bridges between micro- and macroevolution.

Jonathan Rolland, L Francisco Henao-Diaz, Michael Doebeli, Rachel Germain, Luke J Harmon, L Lacey Knowles, Lee Hsiang Liow, Judith E Mank, Antonin Machac, Sarah P Otto and 7 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature ecology & evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Gene tree patterns help answer: vicariance or dispersal?bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Persistent selection on size explains micro- and macroevolutionary alignments in fly wings.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cooperation and the evolution of bacterial niche breadth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Egg mass drives the evolution of bird nest architecture.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Evolution of developmental bias explains divergent patterns of phenotypic evolution in two nematode clades.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jonathan RollandCNRS, UMR5174, Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France. jonathan.rolland@univ-tlse3.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7141-0870
L Francisco Henao-DiazDepartment of Zoology, and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Michael DoebeliDepartment of Zoology, and Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5975-5710
Rachel GermainDepartment of Zoology, and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1270-6639
Luke J HarmonDept. of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4985-5750
L Lacey KnowlesDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6567-4853
Lee Hsiang LiowNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3732-6069
Judith E MankDepartment of Zoology, and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2450-513X
Antonin MachacDepartment of Zoology, and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sarah P OttoDepartment of Zoology, and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3042-0818
Matt PennellDepartments of Quantitative and Computational Biology and Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Nicolas SalaminDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3963-4954
Daniele SilvestroDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0100-0961
Mauro SugawaraDepartment of Zoology, and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0403-8586
Josef UyedaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Catherine E WagnerDepartment of Botany, and Program in Ecology and Evolution, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8585-6120
Dolph SchluterDepartment of Zoology, and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1683-7836

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Explaining broad molecular, phenotypic and species biodiversity patterns necessitates a unifying framework spanning multiple evolutionary scales. Here we argue that although substantial effort has been made to reconcile microevolution and macroevolution, much work remains to identify the links between biological processes at play. We highlight four major questions of evolutionary biology whose solutions require conceptual bridges between micro and macroevolution. We review potential avenues for future research to establish how mechanisms at one scale (drift, mutation, migration, selection) translate to processes at the other scale (speciation, extinction, biogeographic dispersal) and vice versa. We propose ways in which current comparative methods to infer molecular evolution, phenotypic evolution and species diversification could be improved to specifically address these questions. We conclude that researchers are in a better position than ever before to build a synthesis to understand how microevolutionary dynamics unfold over millions of years.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEvolution, MolecularBiodiversity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.