Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37429876›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Performance investigation of state-of-the-art metaheuristic techniques for parameter extraction of solar cells/module.

Abhishek Sharma, Abhinav Sharma, Moshe Averbukh, Vibhu Jately, Shailendra Rajput, Brian Azzopardi, Wei Hong Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abhishek SharmaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Graphic Era Deemed to Be University, Dehradun, 248002, India.
Abhinav SharmaDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, 248007, India.
Moshe AverbukhDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Ariel University, 40700, Ariel, Israel.
Vibhu JatelyDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, 248007, India.
Shailendra RajputCollege of Engineering, Xi'an International University, Xi'an, 710077, China.
Brian AzzopardiMCAST Energy Research Group (MCAST Energy), Institute of Engineering and Transport, Malta College of Arts, Science and Technology (MCAST), Triq Kordin, Paola, PLA 9032, Malta.
Wei Hong LimFaculty of Engineering, Technology and Built Environment, UCSI University, 56000, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. limwh@ucsiuniversity.edu.my.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the greatest challenges for widespread utilization of solar energy is the low conversion efficiency, motivating the needs of developing more innovative approaches to improve the design of solar energy conversion equipment. Solar cell is the fundamental component of a photovoltaic (PV) system. Solar cell's precise modelling and estimation of its parameters are of paramount importance for the simulation, design, and control of PV system to achieve optimal performances. It is nontrivial to estimate the unknown parameters of solar cell due to the nonlinearity and multimodality of search space. Conventional optimization methods tend to suffer from numerous drawbacks such as a tendency to be trapped in some local optima when solving this challenging problem. This paper aims to investigate the performance of eight state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms (MAs) to solve the solar cell parameter estimation problem on four case studies constituting of four different types of PV systems: R.T.C. France solar cell, LSM20 PV module, Solarex MSX-60 PV module, and SS2018P PV module. These four cell/modules are built using different technologies. The simulation results clearly indicate that the Coot-Bird Optimization technique obtains the minimum RMSE values of 1.0264E-05 and 1.8694E-03 for the R.T.C. France solar cell and the LSM20 PV module, respectively, while the wild horse optimizer outperforms in the case of the Solarex MSX-60 and SS2018 PV modules and gives the lowest value of RMSE as 2.6961E-03 and 4.7571E-05, respectively. Furthermore, the performances of all eight selected MAs are assessed by employing two non-parametric tests known as Friedman ranking and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. A full description is also provided, enabling the readers to understand the capability of each selected MA in improving the solar cell modelling that can enhance its energy conversion efficiency. Referring to the results obtained, some thoughts and suggestions for further improvements are provided in the conclusion section.

Identifiers

PMID37429876
PMCPMC10333343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.