Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37429511›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical informatics2023

Deep imputation of missing values in time series health data: A review with benchmarking.

Maksims Kazijevs, Manar D Samad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Time-series ECG Imputation Using a Pattern-Based Masking Framework.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maksims KazijevsDepartment of Computer Science, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, United States.
Manar D SamadDepartment of Computer Science, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, United States. Electronic address: msamad@tnstate.edu.

Funding

Optimizing the Utility of Large Electronic Health Records Data in Data-Driven Health ResearchR15LM013569 · NLM · TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SAMAD, MANAR · 2020 to 2020
$422k
NLM NIH HHS R15 LM013569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The imputation of missing values in multivariate time series (MTS) data is critical in ensuring data quality and producing reliable data-driven predictive models. Apart from many statistical approaches, a few recent studies have proposed state-of-the-art deep learning methods to impute missing values in MTS data. However, the evaluation of these deep methods is limited to one or two data sets, low missing rates, and completely random missing value types. This survey performs six data-centric experiments to benchmark state-of-the-art deep imputation methods on five time series health data sets. Our extensive analysis reveals that no single imputation method outperforms the others on all five data sets. The imputation performance depends on data types, individual variable statistics, missing value rates, and types. Deep learning methods that jointly perform cross-sectional (across variables) and longitudinal (across time) imputations of missing values in time series data yield statistically better data quality than traditional imputation methods. Although computationally expensive, deep learning methods are practical given the current availability of high-performance computing resources, especially when data quality and sample size are of paramount importance in healthcare informatics. Our findings highlight the importance of data-centric selection of imputation methods to optimize data-driven predictive models.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingResearch DesignCross-Sectional StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsCross-sectional imputationDeep neural networkElectronic health recordsLongitudinal imputationMissing value imputationMultivariate dataSensor dataTime series

Identifiers

PMID37429511
PMCPMC10529422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.