Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37429192›Full record

ArticleJournal of hazardous materials2023

Precise isolation and structural origin of an ultra-specific nanobody against chemical compound.

Huijuan Yang, Natalia Vasylieva, Jiaxin Wang, Zhenfeng Li, Wenbo Duan, Shuang Chen, Kai Wen, Hui Meng, Xuezhi Yu, Jianzhong Shen and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hazardous materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Huijuan YangNational Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Security, College of Veterinary Medicine China Agricultural University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Detection Technology for Animal-Derived Food Safety, and Beijing Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety, Beijing 100193, China.
Natalia VasylievaDepartment of Entomology and UCD Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States.
Jiaxin WangNational Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Security, College of Veterinary Medicine China Agricultural University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Detection Technology for Animal-Derived Food Safety, and Beijing Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety, Beijing 100193, China.
Zhenfeng LiDepartment of Entomology and UCD Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States.
Wenbo DuanNational Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Security, College of Veterinary Medicine China Agricultural University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Detection Technology for Animal-Derived Food Safety, and Beijing Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety, Beijing 100193, China.
Shuang ChenNational Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Security, College of Veterinary Medicine China Agricultural University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Detection Technology for Animal-Derived Food Safety, and Beijing Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety, Beijing 100193, China.
Kai WenNational Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Security, College of Veterinary Medicine China Agricultural University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Detection Technology for Animal-Derived Food Safety, and Beijing Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety, Beijing 100193, China.
Hui MengSchool of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013 Jiangsu, China.
Xuezhi YuNational Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Security, College of Veterinary Medicine China Agricultural University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Detection Technology for Animal-Derived Food Safety, and Beijing Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety, Beijing 100193, China.
Jianzhong ShenNational Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Security, College of Veterinary Medicine China Agricultural University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Detection Technology for Animal-Derived Food Safety, and Beijing Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety, Beijing 100193, China.
Bruce D HammockDepartment of Entomology and UCD Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States.
Zhanhui WangNational Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Security, College of Veterinary Medicine China Agricultural University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Detection Technology for Animal-Derived Food Safety, and Beijing Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety, Beijing 100193, China. Electronic address: wangzhanhui@cau.edu.cn.
China Agricultural University · CNUniversity of California, Davis · USBeijing University of Agriculture · CNJiangsu University · CN

Funding

Workshop on Environmental Technology Transfer and EntrepreneurshipP42ES004699 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI YOUNG, THOMAS MICHAEL · 1987 to 2021
$50.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES004699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Highly specific antibodies are the key reagents for developing immunoassays with a low false positive rate for environmental monitoring. Here, we provide evidence that nanobodies have the potential to achieve higher specificity than conventional antibodies and explain why from their structural features. Using sulfadimethoxine (SDM) as a model analyte, we constructed an immune phage display library and precisely isolated an ultra-specific nanobody (H1-17) by a crucial homologous antigen counter selection strategy. H1-17 showed no observable cross-reactivity (CR) with other structural analogs of 41 SDM tested, which has never been achieved by conventional antibodies. The structurally original specificity of H1-17 was illuminated and compared with that of one conventional antibody by homology modeling and site-directed mutagenesis validation. It was found that the noncanonical disulfide bond (C50-C104) of H1-17 helped CDR3 form a tailor-made binding pocket and divide it into two parts to accommodate the common structure of sulfonamides and the characteristic methoxyl group of SDM, respectively. Besides, the mutual-checking hydrogen bonds also played important roles in the specific recognition. Lastly, immunoassays with zero false positive rate were developed to screen SDM in water and milk samples, indicating that nanobodies could be reliable reagents for the accurate detection of chemical compounds.

Indexed as

Single-Domain AntibodiesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayImmunoassayIndicators and ReagentsIndicators and ReagentsSingle-Domain AntibodiesAccurate detectionImmunoassayNanobodyRecognition mechanismUltra-specificity

Identifiers

PMID37429192
PMCPMC10686526
OpenAlexW4382364227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.