Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37428988›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2023

Machine Learning-Assisted Recurrence Prediction for Patients With Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Adrianna Janik, Maria Torrente, Luca Costabello, Virginia Calvo, Brian Walsh, Carlos Camps, Sameh K Mohamed, Ana L Ortega, Vít Nováček, Bartomeu Massutí and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Virtual patient analysis identifies strategies to improve the performance of predictive biomarkers for PD-1 blockade.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Adrianna JanikAccenture Labs, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4387-4563
Maria TorrenteMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8791-7660
Luca CostabelloAccenture Labs, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0720-9347
Virginia CalvoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Brian WalshData Science Institute, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Carlos CampsHospital General de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0648-5403
Sameh K MohamedData Science Institute, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2659-2406
Ana L OrtegaHospital Universitario de Jaén, Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5727-3371
Vít NováčekData Science Institute, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Bartomeu MassutíHospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Pasquale MinerviniUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8442-602X
M Rosario Garcia CampeloComplejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Edel Del BarcoHospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Joaquim Bosch-BarreraInstitut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Universitari Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0893-7821
Ernestina MenasalvasPolytechnic University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5615-6798
Mohan TimilsinaData Science Institute, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3886-9898
Mariano ProvencioMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6315-7919

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStratifying patients with cancer according to risk of relapse can personalize their care. In this work, we provide an answer to the following research question: How to use machine learning to estimate probability of relapse in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)? MATERIALS AND

methodsFor predicting relapse in 1,387 patients with early-stage (I-II) NSCLC from the Spanish Lung Cancer Group data (average age 65.7 years, female 24.8%, male 75.2%), we train tabular and graph machine learning models. We generate automatic explanations for the predictions of such models. For models trained on tabular data, we adopt SHapley Additive exPlanations local explanations to gauge how each patient feature contributes to the predicted outcome. We explain graph machine learning predictions with an example-based method that highlights influential past patients.

resultsMachine learning models trained on tabular data exhibit a 76% accuracy for the random forest model at predicting relapse evaluated with a 10-fold cross-validation (the model was trained 10 times with different independent sets of patients in test, train, and validation sets, and the reported metrics are averaged over these 10 test sets). Graph machine learning reaches 68% accuracy over a held-out test set of 200 patients, calibrated on a held-out set of 100 patients.

conclusionOur results show that machine learning models trained on tabular and graph data can enable objective, personalized, and reproducible prediction of relapse and, therefore, disease outcome in patients with early-stage NSCLC. With further prospective and multisite validation, and additional radiological and molecular data, this prognostic model could potentially serve as a predictive decision support tool for deciding the use of adjuvant treatments in early-stage lung cancer.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID37428988
PMCPMC10569772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.