Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37428713›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Individual, organizational and system circumstances, and the functioning of a multi-country implementation-focused network for maternal, newborn and child health: Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda.

Anene Tesfa, Catherine Nakidde, Kohenour Akter, Fatama Khatun, Kondwani Mwandira, Seblewengel Lemma, Gloria Seruwagi, Kasonde Mwaba, Mike English, Callie Daniels-Howell and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Anene TesfaEthiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3513-1097
Catherine NakiddeSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8965-3582
Kohenour AkterPerinatal Care Project, Diabetic Association of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0409-1099
Fatama KhatunPerinatal Care Project, Diabetic Association of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Kondwani MwandiraParent and Child Health Initiative PACHI, Lilongwe, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8362-7156
Seblewengel LemmaDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5910-3723
Gloria SeruwagiSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Kasonde MwabaInstitute for Global Health, University College, London, United Kingdom.
Mike EnglishCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7427-0826
Callie Daniels-HowellInstitute for Global Health, University College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3238-9375
Nehla DjellouliInstitute for Global Health, University College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4200-2314
Tim ColbournInstitute for Global Health, University College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6917-6552
Tanya MarchantDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4228-4334
QCN Evaluation Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Better policies, investments, and programs are needed to improve the integration and quality of maternal, newborn, and child health services. Previously, partnerships and collaborations that involved multiple countries with a unified aim have been observed to yield positive results. Since 2017, the WHO and partners have hosted the Quality of Care Network [QCN], a multi-country implementation network focused on improving maternal, neonatal, and child health care. In this paper, we examine the functionality of QCN in different contexts. We focus on implementation circumstances and contexts in four network countries: Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda. In each country, the study was conducted over several consecutive rounds between 2019-2022, employing 227 key informant interviews with major stakeholders and members of the network countries, and 42 facility observations. The collected data were coded using Nvivo-12 software and categorized thematically. The study showed that individual, organizational and system-level circumstances all played an important role in shaping implementation success in network countries, but that these levels were inter-linked. Systems that enabled leadership, motivated and trained staff, and created a positive culture of data use were critical for policy-making including addressing financing issues-to the day-to-day practice improvement at the front line. Some characteristics of QCN actively supported this, for example, shared learning forums for continuous learning, a focus on data and tracking progress, and emphasising the importance of coordinated efforts towards a common goal. However, inadequate system financing and capacity also hampered network functioning, especially in the face of external shocks.

Identifiers

PMID37428713
PMCPMC10332621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.