Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37428683›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2023

Beef embryos in dairy cows: feedlot performance, mechanistic responses, and carcass characteristics of straightbred Holstein calves and Angus-sired calves from Holstein, Jersey, or crossbred beef dams.

Luke K Fuerniss, Kaitlyn R Wesley, Sydney M Bowman, Jerica R Hall, J Daniel Young, Jonathon L Beckett, Dale R Woerner, Ryan J Rathmann, Bradley J Johnson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Foundational reproduction programs for U.S. dairy herds.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luke K FuernissDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Kaitlyn R WesleyDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Sydney M BowmanDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Jerica R HallDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
J Daniel YoungDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Jonathon L BeckettBeckett Consulting Services, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA.
Dale R WoernerDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Ryan J RathmannDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Bradley J JohnsonDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Texas Tech University · US

Funding

Texas Tech University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved reproductive management has allowed dairy cow pregnancies to be optimized for beef production. The objective of this sire-controlled study was to test the feedlot performance of straightbred beef calves raised on a calf ranch and to compare finishing growth performance, carcass characteristics, and mechanistic responses relative to beef × dairy crossbreds and straightbred beef cattle raised in a traditional beef cow/calf system. Tested treatment groups included straightbred beef steers and heifers reared on range (A × B; n = 14), straightbred beef steers and heifers born following embryo transfer to Holstein dams (H ET; n = 15) and Jersey dams (J ET; n = 16) The finishing trial began when cattle weighed 301 ± 32.0 kg and concluded after 195 ± 1.4 d. Individual intake was recorded from day 28 until shipment for slaughter. All cattle were weighed every 28 d; serum was collected from a subset of steers every 56 d. Cattle of straightbred beef genetics (A × B, H ET, and J ET) and A × H were similar in final shrunk body weight, dry matter intake, and carcass weight (P > 0.05 for each variable). Compared with A × J cattle, J ET was 42 d younger at slaughter with 42 kg more carcass weight (P < 0.05 for both variables). No difference was observed in longissimus muscle area between all treatments (P = 0.40). Fat thickness was greatest for straightbred beef cattle, least for A × J cattle, and intermediate for A × H cattle (P < 0.05). When adjusted for percentage of adjusted final body weight, feed efficiency was greater for straightbred beef cattle compared with beef × dairy crossbred cattle (P = 0.04). A treatment × day interaction was observed for circulating insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I; P < 0.01); 112 d after being implanted, beef × dairy crossbred cattle had greater circulating IGF-I concentration than cattle of straightbred beef genetics (P < 0.05). Straightbred beef calves born to Jersey cows had more efficient feedlot and carcass performance than A × J crossbreds. Calves of straightbred beef genetics raised traditionally or in a calf ranch performed similarly in the feedlot.

Indexed as

Body CompositionInsulin-Like Growth Factor IAnimalsBody WeightCattleFemaleParturitionPregnancyReproductionInsulin-Like Growth Factor Ibeefdairyembryofeedlot

Identifiers

PMID37428683
PMCPMC10362931
OpenAlexW4383742726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.