Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37428679›Full record

ReviewDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2023

The importance of graph databases and graph learning for clinical applications.

Daniel Walke, Daniel Micheel, Kay Schallert, Thilo Muth, David Broneske, Gunter Saake, Robert Heyer

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Graph Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2024
    Review
  4. Microbiome modeling: a beginner's guide.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel WalkeBioprocess Engineering, Otto von Guericke University, Universitätsplatz 2, Magdeburg 39106, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5094-3566
Daniel MicheelDatabase and Software Engineering Group, Otto von Guericke University, Universitätsplatz 2, Magdeburg 39106, Germany.
Kay SchallertMultidimensional Omics Analyses Group, Leibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften-ISAS-e.V., Bunsen-Kirchhoff-Straße 11, Dortmund 44139, Germany.
Thilo MuthSection eScience (S.3), Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Unter den Eichen 87, Berlin 12205, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8304-2684
David BroneskeInfrastructure and Methods, German Center for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW), Lange Laube 12, Hannover 30159, Germany.
Gunter SaakeDatabase and Software Engineering Group, Otto von Guericke University, Universitätsplatz 2, Magdeburg 39106, Germany.
Robert HeyerMultidimensional Omics Analyses Group, Leibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften-ISAS-e.V., Bunsen-Kirchhoff-Straße 11, Dortmund 44139, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing amount and complexity of clinical data require an appropriate way of storing and analyzing those data. Traditional approaches use a tabular structure (relational databases) for storing data and thereby complicate storing and retrieving interlinked data from the clinical domain. Graph databases provide a great solution for this by storing data in a graph as nodes (vertices) that are connected by edges (links). The underlying graph structure can be used for the subsequent data analysis (graph learning). Graph learning consists of two parts: graph representation learning and graph analytics. Graph representation learning aims to reduce high-dimensional input graphs to low-dimensional representations. Then, graph analytics uses the obtained representations for analytical tasks like visualization, classification, link prediction and clustering which can be used to solve domain-specific problems. In this survey, we review current state-of-the-art graph database management systems, graph learning algorithms and a variety of graph applications in the clinical domain. Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive use case for a clearer understanding of complex graph learning algorithms. Graphical abstract.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabase Management SystemsCluster AnalysisDatabases, Factual

Identifiers

PMID37428679
PMCPMC10332447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.