ArticleBJS open2023
Evaluation of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) data with the Mainz IONM Quality Assurance and Analysis tool.
Article in BJS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntraoperative neuromonitoring is widely used in thyroid and parathyroid surgery to prevent unilateral and especially bilateral recurrent nerve paresis. Reference values for amplitude and latency for the recurrent laryngeal nerve and vagus nerve have been published. However, data quality measures that exclude errors of the underlying intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) data (immanent software errors, false data labelling) before statistical analysis have not yet been implemented.
methodsThe authors developed an easy-to-use application (the Mainz IONM Quality Assurance and Analysis tool) using the programming language R. This tool allows visualization, automated and manual correction, and statistical analysis of complete raw data sets (electromyogram signals of all stimulations) from intermittent and continuous neuromonitoring in thyroid and parathyroid surgery. The Mainz IONM Quality Assurance and Analysis tool was used to evaluate IONM data generated and exported from 'C2' and 'C2 Xplore' neuromonitoring devices (inomed Medizintechnik GmbH) after surgery. For the first time, reference values for latency and amplitude were calculated based on 'cleaned' IONM data.
resultsIntraoperative neuromonitoring data files of 1935 patients consecutively operated on from June 2014 to May 2020 were included. Of 1921 readable files, 34 were excluded for missing data labelling. Automated plausibility checks revealed: less than 3 per cent device errors for electromyogram signal detection; 1138 files (approximately 60 per cent) contained potential labelling errors or inconsistencies necessitating manual review; and 915 files (48.5 per cent) were indeed erroneous. Mean(s.d.) reference onset latencies for the left vagus nerve, right vagus nerve, recurrent laryngeal nerve, and external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve were 6.8(1.1), 4.2(0.8), 2.5(1.1), and 2.1(0.5) ms, respectively.
conclusionDue to high error frequencies, IONM data should undergo in-depth review and multi-step cleaning processes before analysis to standardize scientific reporting. Device software calculates latencies differently; therefore reference values are device-specific (latency) and/or set-up-specific (amplitude). Novel C2-specific reference values for latency and amplitude deviate considerably from published values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.