Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37428506›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2023

Effect of Maternal Egg Intake During the Early Neonatal Period and Risk of Infant Egg Allergy at 12 Months Among Breastfeeding Mothers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ken-Ichi Nagakura, Sakura Sato, Wakako Shinahara, Hiroshi Kido, Hidetoshi Fujita, Takanori Yanai, Nao Akiyama, Masaki Futamura, Hiroshi Koga, Michimasa Fujiwara and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Ken-Ichi NagakuraDepartment of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Sakura SatoDepartment of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Wakako ShinaharaDivision of Enzyme Chemistry, Institute for Enzyme Research, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Hiroshi KidoDivision of Enzyme Chemistry, Institute for Enzyme Research, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Hidetoshi FujitaDepartment of Pediatrics, Aiwa hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Takanori YanaiDepartment of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Yokohama Medical Center, Kanagawa, Japan.
Nao AkiyamaDepartment of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Saitama Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Masaki FutamuraDepartment of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, Aichi, Japan.
Hiroshi KogaDepartment of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Beppu Medical Center, Oita, Japan.
Michimasa FujiwaraDepartment of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Fukuyama Medical Center, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hideo KanekoDepartment of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Nagara Medical Center, Gifu, Japan.
Hiroaki TaniguchiDepartment of Pediatrics, Konan Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan.
Eishi MakitaDepartment of Pediatrics, Saitama Medical Center Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Kyohei TakahashiDepartment of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Noriyuki YanagidaDepartment of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Motohiro EbisawaDepartment of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Mitsuyoshi UrashimaDivision of Molecular Epidemiology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
National Sagamihara Hospital · JPNational Hospital Organization · JPTokushima University · JPBeppu Medical Center · JPJichi Medical University · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPNagara Medical Center · JPSeiwa Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Egg introduction in infants at age 4 to 6 months is associated with a lower risk of immunoglobulin E-mediated egg allergy (EA). However, whether their risk of EA at age 12 months is affected by maternal intake of eggs at birth is unknown. Objective: To determine the effect of maternal egg intake during the early neonatal period (0-5 days) on the development of EA in breastfed infants at age 12 months. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, single-blind (outcome data evaluators), randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 18, 2017, to May 31, 2021, at 10 medical facilities in Japan. Newborns with at least 1 of 2 parents having an allergic disease were included. Neonates whose mothers had EA or were unable to consume breast milk after the age of 2 days were excluded. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Interventions: Newborns were randomized (1:1) to a maternal egg consumption (MEC) group, wherein the mothers consumed 1 whole egg per day during the first 5 days of the neonate's life, and a maternal egg elimination (MEE) group, wherein the mothers eliminated eggs from their diet during the same period. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was EA at age 12 months. Egg allergy was defined as sensitization to egg white or ovomucoid plus a positive test result in an oral food challenge or an episode of obvious immediate symptoms after egg ingestion. Results: Of the 380 newborns included (198 [52.1%] female), 367 (MEC: n = 183; MEE: n = 184) were followed up for 12 months. On days 3 and 4 after delivery, the proportions of neonates with ovalbumin and ovomucoid detection in breast milk were higher in the MEC group than in the MEE group (ovalbumin: 10.7% vs 2.0%; risk ratio [RR], 5.23; 95% CI, 1.56-17.56; ovomucoid: 11.3% vs 2.0%; RR, 5.55; 95% CI, 1.66-18.55). At age 12 months, the MEC and MEE groups did not differ significantly in EA (9.3% vs 7.6%; RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.62-2.40) or sensitization to egg white (62.8% vs 58.7%; RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.91-1.26). No adverse effects were reported. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, EA development and sensitization to eggs were unaffected by MEC during the early neonatal period. Trial Registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000027593.

Indexed as

Egg HypersensitivityBreast FeedingFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMilk, HumanMothersOvalbuminOvomucinSingle-Blind MethodOvalbuminOvomucin

Identifiers

PMID37428506
PMCPMC10334231
OpenAlexW4383711186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.