Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37428398›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2023

The Responsiveness of Mental Health Service Professionals to Two Years of Pandemic Emergency in Italy.

Lorenza Magliano, Ginevra Di Maio, Chiara Papa, Tommaso Bonavigo, Fabrizio Starace, Gaetana Affuso

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lorenza MaglianoDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Viale Ellittico 31, Caserta, I-81100, Italy. lorenza.magliano@unicampania.it.ORCID 0000-0002-4733-3975
Ginevra Di MaioDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Viale Ellittico 31, Caserta, I-81100, Italy.
Chiara PapaDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Viale Ellittico 31, Caserta, I-81100, Italy.
Tommaso BonavigoDepartment of Mental Health, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI) (Giuliano Isontino Health University District (ASUGI), Trieste, Italy.
Fabrizio StaraceDepartment of Mental Health and Drug Abuse, Azienda Unitá Sanitaria Locale (AUSL) Modena (Local Unit Health Agency of Modena), Modena, Italy.
Gaetana AffusoDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Viale Ellittico 31, Caserta, I-81100, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This multicenter cross-sectional study explored the responsiveness of Mental Health Services (MHS) to two years of COVID-19 emergency in Italy. Specifically, the study explored the ability of staff to: acknowledge users' capabilities and value teamwork; reinvent the service and maintain/introduce good practices; and, acknowledge the positive aspects of the pandemic experience. These aspects were investigated in relation to socio-demographic and professional variables. Professionals from 17 MHS of 15 Italian Regions completed an online questionnaire on the MHS transformation during COVID-19. Data were collected at the end of the national health emergency (March 1-April 30, 2022). Most of the 1077 participants said they: paid more attention to users' physical health; revised treatment plans; mediated between user needs and safe work procedures; revalued the importance of gestures and habits; discovered unexpected personal resources in users; and, found positive aspects in the COVID-19 experience. The multivariate analyses showed significant differences in staff opinions related to gender, workplace, professional role, and geographic area of the MHS, covarying with staff work experience. Compared to male staff, female staff perceived MHS as more flexible and capable to maintain best practices, and female staff acknowledged more capabilities to the users. Compared to central and northern Italy staff, southern Italy staff gave more values to teamwork, perceived MHS as more capable to maintain best practices and acknowledged higher positive transformations. These findings may be useful for planning community-oriented MHS in the post-pandemic period, taking into account both the experience gained by staff and the MHS process of adaptation.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental Health ServicesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMalePandemicsCOVID-19Mental health servicesMental health staffStaff views

Identifiers

PMID37428398
PMCPMC10543825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.