Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37428304›Full record

ArticleHealth care management science2023

Covid-19 triage in the emergency department 2.0: how analytics and AI transform a human-made algorithm for the prediction of clinical pathways.

Christina C Bartenschlager, Milena Grieger, Johanna Erber, Tobias Neidel, Stefan Borgmann, Jörg J Vehreschild, Markus Steinbrecher, Siegbert Rieg, Melanie Stecher, Christine Dhillon and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health care management science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Christina C BartenschlagerHealth Care Operations/Health Information Management, Faculty of Business and Economics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Universitätsstraße 16, 86159, Augsburg, Germany.
Milena GriegerHealth Care Operations/Health Information Management, Faculty of Business and Economics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Universitätsstraße 16, 86159, Augsburg, Germany.
Johanna ErberDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, University Hospital Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Tobias NeidelAnaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Stefan BorgmannHygiene and Infectiology, Klinikum Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany.
Jörg J VehreschildDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Markus SteinbrecherClinic for Internal Medicine III - Gastroenterology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Siegbert RiegClinic for Internal Medicine II - Infectiology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Melanie StecherDepartment I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christine DhillonCOVID-19 Task Force, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Maria M RuethrichHematology and Internal Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Carolin E M JakobDepartment I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Martin HowerPneumology, Infectiology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum Dortmund, Germany.
Axel R HellerAnaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Maria VehreschildDepartment of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Christoph WyenPraxis am Ebertplatz, Cologne, Germany.
Helmut MessmannClinic for Internal Medicine III - Gastroenterology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Christiane PiepelDepartment of Hemato-Oncology and Infectious Diseases, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany.
Jens O BrunnerHealth Care Operations/Health Information Management, Faculty of Business and Economics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Universitätsstraße 16, 86159, Augsburg, Germany. jens.brunner@uni-a.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2700-4795
Frank HansesInternal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Christoph RömmeleClinic for Internal Medicine III - Gastroenterology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
LEOSS study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has pushed many hospitals to their capacity limits. Therefore, a triage of patients has been discussed controversially primarily through an ethical perspective. The term triage contains many aspects such as urgency of treatment, severity of the disease and pre-existing conditions, access to critical care, or the classification of patients regarding subsequent clinical pathways starting from the emergency department. The determination of the pathways is important not only for patient care, but also for capacity planning in hospitals. We examine the performance of a human-made triage algorithm for clinical pathways which is considered a guideline for emergency departments in Germany based on a large multicenter dataset with over 4,000 European Covid-19 patients from the LEOSS registry. We find an accuracy of 28 percent and approximately 15 percent sensitivity for the ward class. The results serve as a benchmark for our extensions including an additional category of palliative care as a new label, analytics, AI, XAI, and interactive techniques. We find significant potential of analytics and AI in Covid-19 triage regarding accuracy, sensitivity, and other performance metrics whilst our interactive human-AI algorithm shows superior performance with approximately 73 percent accuracy and up to 76 percent sensitivity. The results are independent of the data preparation process regarding the imputation of missing values or grouping of comorbidities. In addition, we find that the consideration of an additional label palliative care does not improve the results.

Indexed as

COVID-19TriageAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceCritical PathwaysEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPandemicsArtificial intelligenceClinical decision makingCovid-19 triageMachine learningPredictive analytics

Identifiers

PMID37428304
PMCPMC10485125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.