Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37428282›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2024

Modeling Epidemiology Data with Machine Learning Technique to Detect Risk Factors for Gastric Cancer.

Kimia Mohammadnezhad, Mahmod Reza Sahebi, Sudabeh Alatab, Alireza Sadjadi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Diagnostic Risk Prediction Models for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kimia MohammadnezhadDepartment of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Faculty of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, 19967-15433, Tehran, Iran.
Mahmod Reza SahebiDepartment of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Faculty of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, 19967-15433, Tehran, Iran. sahebi@kntu.ac.ir.
Sudabeh AlatabDigestive Disease Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza SadjadiDigestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGastric cancer (GC) ranks as the 7th most common cancer worldwide and a leading cause of cancer mortality. In Iran, stomach malignancies are the most common fatal cancers with higher than world average incidence. In recent years, methods like machine learning that provide the opportunity of merging health issues with computational power and learning capacity have caught considerable attention for prediction and diagnosis of diseases. In this study, we aimed to model GC data to find risk factors and identify GC cases in Golestan Cohort Study (GCS), using gradient boosting as a machine learning technique.

methodsSince the GC class (280) was smaller than not-GC (49,467), "Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique" was used to balance the dataset. Seventy percent of the data was used to train the gradient boosting algorithm and find effective factors on gastric cancer, and the remaining 30% was used for accuracy assessment.

resultsOur results indicated that out of 19 factors, age, social economical status, tea temperature, body mass index, gender, and education were the top six effective factors with impact rates of 0.24, 0.16, 0.13, 0.13, and 0.07, respectively. The trained model classified 70 out of 72 GC patients in the test set, correctly.

conclusionThe results indicate that this model can effectively detect gastric cancer (GC) by utilizing important risk factors, thus avoiding the need for invasive procedures. The model's performance is reliable when provided with an adequate amount of input data, and as the dataset expands, its accuracy and generalization improve significantly. Overall, the trained system's success stems from its ability to identify risk factors and identify cancer patients.

Indexed as

Machine LearningStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsEarly detection of cancerEpidemiologyGradient boostingMachine learningRisk factorsStomach neoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.