Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37428256›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2023

Sacral neuromodulation for low anterior resection syndrome: current status-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Marco Pires, Milton Severo, Ana Lopes, Sílvia Neves, Klaus Matzel, Ana Povo

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Management of bowel dysfunction after pelvic surgery for endometriosis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, Role of SNM?Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Neuromodulation and the Gut-Brain Axis: Therapeutic Mechanisms and Implications for Gastrointestinal and Neurological Disorders.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco PiresServiço de Cirurgia Geral, Departamento de Cirurgia, Porto, CHUdSA, Portugal. marco_alex_pires@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5916-6134
Milton SeveroICBAS-UP-School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Porto, Portugal.
Ana LopesServiço de Urologia, Departamento de Cirurgia, Porto, CHUdSA, Portugal.
Sílvia NevesICBAS-UP-School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Porto, Portugal.
Klaus MatzelSection of Coloproctology, Department of Surgery, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Ana PovoICBAS-UP-School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHospital de São João · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIt is estimated that approximately 70% of patients with rectal cancer who undergo surgery will suffer from Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS). In the last decades, sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has been widely used in urinary dysfunction and in faecal incontinence refractory to medical treatment. Its application in LARS has been investigated and has shown promising results. The paper's aim is to present a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature and evaluate the therapeutic success of SNM in patients with LARS.

methodsA systematic search was performed in international health-related databases: Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed and SciELO. No restrictions on year of publication or language were applied. Retrieved articles were screened and selected according to set inclusion criteria. Data items were collected and processed for each included article and a meta-analysis was done according to the PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome was the number of successful definitive SNM implants. Further outcomes included changes in bowel habits, incontinence scores, quality of life scores, anorectal manometry data and complications.

resultsA total of 18 studies were included, with 164 patients being submitted to percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE) with 91% responding successfully. During follow-up of therapeutic SNM some devices were explanted. The final clinical success rate was 77% after permanent implant. Other outcomes, such as the frequency of incontinent episodes, faecal incontinence scores, quality of life scores were overall improved after SNM. The meta-analysis showed a decrease in 10.11 incontinent episodes/week; a decrease of 9.86 points in the Wexner score and an increase in quality of life of 1.56 (pooled estimate). Changes in anorectal manometry were inconsistent. Local infection was the most common post-operative complication, followed by pain, mechanical issues, loss of efficacy and haematoma. DISCUSSION/

conclusionThis is the largest systematic review and meta-analysis concerning the use of SNM in LARS patients. The findings support the available evidence that sacral neuromodulation can be effective in the treatment of LARS, with significant improvement in total incontinent episodes and patients´ quality of life.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyFecal IncontinenceRectal NeoplasmsUrinary IncontinenceHumansLow Anterior Resection SyndromeLumbosacral PlexusPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeFaecal incontinence (FI)Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS)Meta-analysisRectal cancerSacral nerve stimulation (SNS)Sacral neuromodulation (SNM)

Identifiers

PMID37428256
OpenAlexW4383711022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.