SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2023
Sacral neuromodulation for low anterior resection syndrome: current status-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic strategies for low anterior resection syndrome: an umbrella review of systematic reviews.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Pooled it
- The efficacy of retrograde and antegrade enemas in the management of low anterior resection syndrome in patients undergoing rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Optimal interventions for low anterior resection syndrome: Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Pooled it
- [Anorectal functional disorders following organ-preserving treatment and resection of rectal cancer].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Management of bowel dysfunction after pelvic surgery for endometriosis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Review
- Sacral neuromodulation improves bowel function in patients with low anterior resection syndrome.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Article
- The first Dutch experience with a nurse-led outpatient clinic for the prevention and treatment of LARS after colorectal surgery: promising results of a standardized treatment protocol.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Observational
- Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, Role of SNM?Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025Review
- Overcoming barriers to accessing sacral neuromodulation care in Canada Re: "Urologist-perceived barriers and perspectives on the underuse of sacral neuromodulation for overactive bladder in Canada" (Can Urol Assoc J 2023;17:E165-71).Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025Article
- Sacral neuromodulation improves functional outcome and quality of life in patients with pouch dysfunction after pan proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
- High output stoma after surgery for rectal cancer - a risk factor for low anterior resection syndrome?BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Article
- Differential effects of low- and high-frequency sacral neuromodulation on urinary symptoms: high-frequency improves Qmax, low-frequency enhances bladder capacity.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Management of Fecal Incontinence: Surgical Treatment Options.Visceral medicine · 2024Review
- Risk factors of the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after ileostomy reversal in rectal cancer patient.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Long-term outcomes of sacral neuromodulation for low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery.Annals of coloproctology · 2024Article
- Neuromodulation and the Gut-Brain Axis: Therapeutic Mechanisms and Implications for Gastrointestinal and Neurological Disorders.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIt is estimated that approximately 70% of patients with rectal cancer who undergo surgery will suffer from Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS). In the last decades, sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has been widely used in urinary dysfunction and in faecal incontinence refractory to medical treatment. Its application in LARS has been investigated and has shown promising results. The paper's aim is to present a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature and evaluate the therapeutic success of SNM in patients with LARS.
methodsA systematic search was performed in international health-related databases: Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed and SciELO. No restrictions on year of publication or language were applied. Retrieved articles were screened and selected according to set inclusion criteria. Data items were collected and processed for each included article and a meta-analysis was done according to the PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome was the number of successful definitive SNM implants. Further outcomes included changes in bowel habits, incontinence scores, quality of life scores, anorectal manometry data and complications.
resultsA total of 18 studies were included, with 164 patients being submitted to percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE) with 91% responding successfully. During follow-up of therapeutic SNM some devices were explanted. The final clinical success rate was 77% after permanent implant. Other outcomes, such as the frequency of incontinent episodes, faecal incontinence scores, quality of life scores were overall improved after SNM. The meta-analysis showed a decrease in 10.11 incontinent episodes/week; a decrease of 9.86 points in the Wexner score and an increase in quality of life of 1.56 (pooled estimate). Changes in anorectal manometry were inconsistent. Local infection was the most common post-operative complication, followed by pain, mechanical issues, loss of efficacy and haematoma. DISCUSSION/
conclusionThis is the largest systematic review and meta-analysis concerning the use of SNM in LARS patients. The findings support the available evidence that sacral neuromodulation can be effective in the treatment of LARS, with significant improvement in total incontinent episodes and patients´ quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.