Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37428216›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2023

Is PSMA PET/CT cost-effective for the primary staging in prostate cancer? First results for European countries and the USA based on the proPSMA trial.

Adrien Holzgreve, Marcus Unterrainer, Jérémie Calais, Thaiza Adams, Daniela E Oprea-Lager, Karolien Goffin, Egesta Lopci, Lena M Unterrainer, Kristina K M Kramer, Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann and 6 more

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Stage migration in prostate cancer: the role of PSMA-PET in identifying oligometastatic disease.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Prostate specific membrane antigen focal ablation imaging (PSMA-FAB).Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Adrien HolzgreveDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. Adrien.Holzgreve@med.lmu.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9566-8438
Marcus UnterrainerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jérémie CalaisAhmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, California, Los Angeles, USA.
Thaiza AdamsAhmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, California, Los Angeles, USA.
Daniela E Oprea-LagerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Karolien GoffinDivision of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Egesta LopciNuclear Medicine Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Lena M UnterrainerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Kristina K M KramerDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nina-Sophie Schmidt-HegemannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jozefina CasuscelliDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christian G StiefDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jens RickeDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Peter BartensteinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Wolfgang G KunzDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Dirk MehrensDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe proPSMA trial at ten Australian centers demonstrated increased sensitivity and specificity for PSMA PET/CT compared to conventional imaging regarding metastatic status in primary high-risk prostate cancer patients. A cost-effectiveness analysis showed benefits of PSMA PET/CT over conventional imaging for the Australian setting. However, comparable data for other countries are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to verify the cost-effectiveness of PSMA PET/CT in several European countries as well as the USA.

methodsClinical data on diagnostic accuracy were derived from the proPSMA trial. Costs for PSMA PET/CT and conventional imaging were taken from reimbursements of national health systems and individual billing information of selected centers in Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and the USA. For comparability, scan duration and the decision tree of the analysis were adopted from the Australian cost-effectiveness study.

resultsIn contrast to the Australian setting, PSMA PET/CT was primarily associated with increased costs in the studied centers in Europe and the USA. Mainly, the scan duration had an impact on the cost-effectiveness. However, costs for an accurate diagnosis using PSMA PET/CT seemed reasonably low compared to the potential consequential costs of an inaccurate diagnosis.

conclusionWe assume that the use of PSMA PET/CT is appropriate from a health economic perspective, but this will need to be verified by a prospective evaluation of patients at initial diagnosis.

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsAustraliaCost-Benefit AnalysisGallium RadioisotopesHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingGallium RadioisotopesCost-effectiveness analysisPrimary stagingProPSMA trialProstate cancerPSMA PET/CT

Identifiers

PMID37428216
PMCPMC10547650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.