ArticleSkeletal radiology2024
Characterizing focal muscle signal on MRI in flexor-pronator muscles' status post ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFocal high signal is commonly seen about the flexor pronator mass on MRI in some patients after ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction of the elbow. The etiology of this high signal is unclear and not described in literature. The hypothesis is that the edema we see on post-operative MRI is related to palmaris longus graft harvest rather than secondary to other causes of muscle edema such as denervation or muscle strain. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An IRB waiver-approved, retrospective search of our radiology database was conducted using the keywords "ucl," "elbow," and "reconstruction" between 1/01/2012 and 1/01/2022, with search parameters set as MRI for exam type. The images were reviewed to evaluate for high signal at the flexor pronator mass by a junior and a senior musculoskeletal radiologist. The surgical notes were then reviewed in electronic medical record system to see which graft was used for the UCL reconstruction.
resultsThe cohort comprised of 33 patients (1 female/32males, 14-51 years old) who had undergone UCL reconstructions. Four patients were excluded from the study secondary to the surgical note not specifying which graft was used. The surgical and imaging dates were also recorded with the largest time gap of 7 years between the surgery and imaging. Seventeen of the 29 patients had palmaris longus harvested from the ipsilateral arm, 1 patient had palmaris longus harvested from the contralateral arm, 2 patients had an internal brace, and 9 patients had a hamstring graft. Seventeen out of 17 (100%) patients with ipsilateral palmaris longus graft demonstrated focal edema at the flexor pronator mass while 0/12 of the patients without the palmaris longus graft showed the focal edema seen by its counterparts.
conclusionHigh signal which is commonly seen at the flexor pronator mass in patient status most UCL reconstruction of the elbow is secondary to the palmaris longus harvest rather than other etiologies such as muscle strain, retear, or trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.