Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37428109›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of translational myology2023

History of international connections of myology in Europe.

Corrado Angelini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of translational myology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Corrado AngeliniDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padua. corrado.angelini@unipd.it.
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past centuries, myology as a basic and clinical science has passed through three major stages of development: the classical period, the modern nosographic stage, and the molecular era. The classical period spans the sixteenth century up to the earlier parts of the twentieth century. During this time, several major muscle diseases were clinically and pathologically characterized, including Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), myotonic dystrophy, and facio-scapulo-humeral dystrophy, by master clinicians such as Duchenne, Erb, Becker, Steinert, Landouzy, Dejerine, Meryon, and others. These accomplishments laid solid foundations for the following modern era with nosographic classification and the following molecular era. European clinicians and scientists were major contributors to the modern era in the second half of the twentieth century, which is characterized by three major discoveries. First, it was observed that substantial elevation of the serum activity of creatine kinase indicates muscle damage or destruction. Then, the adaptation of modern histo-and cytochemical techniques to the study of muscle biopsies markedly improved the diagnostic accuracy and made possible the identification of new changes and structures. Thirdly, the advent of modern biochemical techniques permitted the identification of various enzyme defects/storage diseases such as Pompe disease, McArdle's disease, and carnitine deficiency states. The molecular era was made possible by the strikingly fast development of molecular biology and its application to muscle diseases. This permitted the identification of gene defects in many inherited diseases, leading to an accurate and specific diagnosis. The growth of international collaboration in Europe was achieved through the exchange of international scientists and collaborative networks.

Identifiers

PMID37428109
PMCPMC10583147
OpenAlexW4383700513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.