ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2023
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leveraging large family analyses for more accurate de novo mutation detection.Biologia futura · 2026Article
- Benchmarking within-sample minority variant detection with short-read sequencing inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Unraveling Epistatic Interactions Between Sites Under Drug-Dependent Selection in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Genome.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Genome-wide approaches to bacterial strain typing: a history and review of recent methodological advances.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2025Review
- ProcaryaSV: structural variation detection pipeline for bacterial genomes using short-read sequencing.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Closing the gap: Oxford Nanopore Technologies R10 sequencing allows comparable results to Illumina sequencing for SNP-based outbreak investigation of bacterial pathogens.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identification and analysis of clinically relevant strains of bacteria increasingly relies on whole-genome sequencing. The downstream bioinformatics steps necessary for calling variants from short-read sequences are well-established but seldom validated against haploid genomes. We devised an
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.