Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37427885›Full record

SynthesisThe Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology2023

Evaluation of Mucosal Healing in Ulcerative Colitis by Fecal Calprotectin vs. Fecal Immunochemical Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Tingpeng Hu, Zhimei Zhang, Fusheng Song, Wenguang Zhang, Jun Yang

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparative Evaluation of Serum Hepcidin and Fecal Calprotectin for Disease Activity Assessment in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Rare Side Effect Due to Vedolizumab in a Patient with Ulcerative Colitis: Catatonic Depression.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. RE: Contribution of Fecal Calprotectin and Fecal Immunochemical Tests to the Evaluation of Patients with Ulcerative Colitis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  9. Contribution of Fecal Calprotectin and Fecal Immunochemical Tests to the Evaluation of Patients with Ulcerative Colitis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tingpeng HuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Banan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhimei ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Banan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Fusheng SongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Banan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Wenguang ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Banan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jun YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Banan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Chongqing Emergency Medical Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucosal healing has been considered a treatment goal for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. To compare the accuracy of fecal immunochemical test and fecal calprotectin in the judgment of mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis, a meta-analysis was performed. We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase for the studies on fecal immunochemical test and fecal calprotectin predicting mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis. The comprehensive sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were calculated to evaluate the accuracy. By analyzing 22 publications, we found that the combined sensitivity and specificity of fecal immunochemical test were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.80-0.92) and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.62-0.81), respectively. The combined sensitivity and specificity of fecal calprotectin were 0.76 (95% CI, 0.70-0.80) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76-0.84), respectively. The area under the curve values of the fecal immunochemical test and fecal calprotectin summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were 0.88 and 0.85, respectively. Consequently, fecal immunochemical test had higher sensitivity in predicting mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis patients, while fecal calprotectin had higher specificity. Compared with fecal calprotectin, fecal immunochemical test was more accurate in judging mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeBiomarkersColonoscopyFecesHumansIntestinal MucosaLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexBiomarkersLeukocyte L1 Antigen Complex

Identifiers

PMID37427885
PMCPMC10544655
OpenAlexW4383711358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.