ArticleThe British journal of radiology2023
The predictive models based on multimodality ultrasonography for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules smaller than 10 mm.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting malignancy in solid thyroid nodules with no or punctate-linear enhancement on contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a retrospective analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Multimodal ultrasound: a non-invasive method for identifying dedifferentiation of papillary thyroid carcinoma during active surveillance.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Analysis of the detection rate and related factors of thyroid nodules in the healthy population.Open life sciences · 2025Article
- Diagnostic value of multimodal ultrasound for breast cancer and prediction of sentinel lymph node metastases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Diagnostic efficacy of data mining method based on multimodal ultrasound for papillary thyroid carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to establish a multimodality ultrasound prediction model based on conventional ultrasound (Con-US), shear wave elastography (SWE), and strain elastography (SE) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and to explore their diagnostic values for thyroid nodules ≤ 10 mm.
methodsThis retrospective study included 198 thyroid nodules (maximum diameter≤10 mm) in 198 thyroid surgery patients who were examined preoperatively with above-mentioned methods. The pathological findings of the thyroid nodules were used as the gold standard, and there were 72 benign nodules and 126 malignant nodules. The multimodal ultrasound prediction models were developed by logistic regression analysis based on the ultrasound image appearances. The diagnostic efficacy of these prediction models was then compared and internally cross-validated in a fivefold manner.
resultsThe specific features on CEUS (enhancement boundary, enhancement direction and decreased nodule area) and the parenchyma-to-nodule strain ratio (PNSR) on SE and SWE ratio were included in the prediction model. The Model one combining American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (ACR TI-RADS) score with PNSR and SWE ratio had the highest sensitivity (92.8%), while the Model three combining TI-RADS score with PNSR, SWE ratio and specific CEUS indicators had the highest specificity, accuracy, and AUC (90.2%,91.4%, and 0.958, respectively).
conclusionThe multimodality ultrasound predictive models effectively improved the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules smaller than 10 mm. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: For the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules ≤ 10 mm, both ultrasound elastography and CEUS could be effective complements to ACR TI-RADS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.