Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37427666›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological rhythms2023

Modeling the Effects of Napping and Non-napping Patterns of Light Exposure on the Human Circadian Oscillator.

Shelby R Stowe, Monique K LeBourgeois, Cecilia Diniz Behn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological rhythms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shelby R StoweDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado.ORCID 0000-0003-2897-4248
Monique K LeBourgeoisDepartment of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado.
Cecilia Diniz BehnDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado.ORCID 0000-0002-8078-5105
Colorado School of Mines · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Sensitivity of the Circadian Clock to Light in Early ChildhoodR01HD087707 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI WRIGHT, KENNETH P · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
Sleep and Emotion Regulation across Early ChildhoodR01MH086566 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI LEBOURGEOIS, MONIQUE K · 2010 to 2014
$2.6M
Transdisciplinary Training in Sleep and Circadian RhythmsT32HL149646 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI Kenneth P Wright · 2020 to 2026
$1.6M
Sleep-Wake Regulation and Emotion in Early ChildhoodK01MH074643 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI LEBOURGEOIS, MONIQUE K · 2005 to 2009
$725k
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL149646NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD087707NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH074643NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In early childhood, consolidation of sleep from a biphasic to a monophasic sleep-wake pattern, that is, the transition from sleeping during an afternoon nap and at night to sleeping only during the night, represents a major developmental milestone. Reduced napping behavior is associated with an advance in the timing of the circadian system; however, it is unknown if this advance represents a standard response of the circadian clock to altered patterns of light exposure or if it additionally reflects features of the developing circadian system. Using a mathematical model of the human circadian pacemaker, we investigated the impact of napping and non-napping patterns of light exposure on entrained circadian phases. Simulated light schedules were based on published data from 20 children (34.2 ± 2.0 months) with habitual napping or non-napping sleep patterns (15 nappers). We found the model predicted different circadian phases for napping and non-napping light patterns: both the decrease in afternoon light during the nap and the increase in evening light associated with napping toddlers' later bedtimes contributed to the observed circadian phase difference produced between napping and non-napping light schedules. We systematically quantified the effects on phase shifting of nap duration, timing, and light intensity, finding larger phase delays occurred for longer and earlier naps. In addition, we simulated phase response curves to a 1-h light pulse and 1-h dark pulse to predict phase and intensity dependence of these changes in light exposure. We found the light pulse produced larger shifts compared with the dark pulse, and we analyzed the model dynamics to identify the features contributing to this asymmetry. These findings suggest that napping status affects circadian timing due to altered patterns of light exposure, with the dynamics of the circadian clock and light processing mediating the effects of the dark pulse associated with a daytime nap.

Indexed as

Circadian ClocksCircadian RhythmChild, PreschoolHumansLightSleepcircadian oscillatorearly childhoodlightmathematical modelnappingphase response curve

Identifiers

PMID37427666
PMCPMC10524998
OpenAlexW4383710804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.