Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37427500›Full record

SynthesisClinical and experimental dental research2023

Resin cement selection for different types of fixed partial coverage restorations: A narrative systematic review.

Safoura Ghodsi, Mina Shekarian, Mohammad Mostafa Aghamohseni, Sasan Rasaeipour, Sarah Arzani

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07778563 (Predictable Method for Restoring Endodontically Treated Teeth, Comparing Indirect and Direct Methods and Materials in Aesthetic Dentistry.), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07778563 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Predictable Method for Restoring Endodontically Treated Teeth, Comparing Indirect and Direct Methods and Materials in Aesthetic Dentistry.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiga Stradins UniversityRan2026 to 2031Enrolled30ConditionsEndodontically Treated Teeth Requiring Indirect Restorative TreatmentArmsCementation with Panavia V5, Cementation with Panavia SA, Injection moulding
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Safoura GhodsiDental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Department of Prosthodontics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-3559-5991
Mina ShekarianDental Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohammad Mostafa AghamohseniPrivate Practitioner and Researcher, Tehran, Iran.
Sasan RasaeipourFellowship in Implant Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sarah ArzaniChild Growth and Development Research Center, Research Institute for Primordial Prevention of Non-Communicable Disease, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0014-471X

Funding

None.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to review the selection criteria of resin cements for different types of partial coverage restorations (PCRs) and investigate if the type of restorations or restorative materials affect the type of selected resin cement. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn electronic search (1991-2023) was performed in PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases by combinations of related keywords.

resultsA total of 68 articles were included to review the selection criteria based on the advantages, disadvantages, indications, and performance of resin cements for different types of PCRs.

conclusionsThe survival and success of PCRs are largely affected by appropriate cement selection. Self-curing and dual-curing resin cements have been recommended for the cementation of metallic PCRs. The PCRs fabricated from thin, translucent, and low-strength ceramics could be adhesively bonded by light-cure conventional resin cements. Self-etching and self-adhesive cements, especially dual-cure types, are not generally indicated for laminate veneers.

Indexed as

CeramicsResin CementsCementationDental CementsDental CementsResin Cementsceramicsdental bondingdental veneerresin bonded ceramicresin cements

Identifiers

PMID37427500
PMCPMC10728549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.