Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37427475›Full record

SynthesisPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023

Why do some bird species incorporate more anthropogenic materials into their nests than others?

Zuzanna Jagiello, S James Reynolds, Jenő Nagy, Mark C Mainwaring, Juan D Ibáñez-Álamo

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Why do some bird species incorporate more anthropogenic materials into their nests than others?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Drivers and consequences of nest ectoparasite pressure in tit nestlings.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The evolutionary ecology of nests: a cross-taxon approach.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zuzanna JagielloDepartment of Zoology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71C, 60-625 Poznań, Poland.
S James ReynoldsCentre for Ornithology, School of Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Jenő NagyELKH-DE Conservation Biology Research Group, Egyetem tér 1, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-8434-4422
Mark C MainwaringField Research Station at Fort Missoula, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0427-9673
Juan D Ibáñez-ÁlamoDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2136-1767

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many bird species incorporate anthropogenic materials (e.g. sweet wrappers, cigarette butts and plastic strings) into their nests. Anthropogenic materials have become widely available as nesting materials in marine and terrestrial environments globally. These human-made objects can provide important benefits to birds such as serving as reliable signals to conspecifics or protecting against ectoparasites, but they can also incur fundamental survival and energetic costs via offspring entanglement and reduced insulative properties, respectively. From an ecological perspective, several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the use of anthropogenic nest materials (ANMs) by birds but no previous interspecific study has tried to identify the underlying mechanisms of this behaviour. In this study, we performed a systematic literature search and ran phylogenetically controlled comparative analyses to examine interspecific variation in the use of ANM and to examine the influence of several ecological and life-history traits. We found that sexual dimorphism and nest type significantly influenced the use of ANMs by birds providing support for the 'signalling hypothesis' that implies that ANMs reflect the quality of the nest builder. However, we found no support for the 'age' and 'new location' hypotheses, nor for a phylogenetic pattern in this behaviour, suggesting that it is widespread throughout birds. This article is part of the theme issue 'The evolutionary ecology of nests: a cross-taxon approach'.

Indexed as

Life History TraitsNesting BehaviorAnimalsBirdsHumansNaphthalenesulfonatesPhylogeny1-azidonaphthalene-5-sulfonateNaphthalenesulfonatesnest materialsnestsnest typephylogenetically controlled comparative analysisplastic

Identifiers

PMID37427475
PMCPMC10331902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.