Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37427470›Full record

SynthesisPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023

Foraging behaviour affects nest architecture in a cross-species comparison of ant nests.

Sean O'Fallon, Kim Drager, Art Zhao, Andrew Suarez, Noa Pinter-Wollman

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Foraging behaviour affects nest architecture in a cross-species comparison of ant nests.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Emergent collective behavior evolves more rapidly than individual behavior among acorn ant species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Bird nest building: visions for the future.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. The evolutionary ecology of nests: a cross-taxon approach.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Central place foraging in an ectotherm and the long-term liability of selecting the "wrong" central place.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sean O'FallonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90065, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0169-3692
Kim DragerDepartment of Evolution, Ecology and Behavior, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Art ZhaoDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90065, USA.
Andrew SuarezDepartment of Evolution, Ecology and Behavior, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2257-3366
Noa Pinter-WollmanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90065, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0448-8037

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals construct and inhabit nests that can exhibit dramatic intra- and interspecific variation due to differences in behaviour, the biotic and abiotic environment, and evolutionary history. In ants, variation in nest architecture reflects both differences in ecology and in the collective behaviour of the colonies that live in the nests. Each component of the nest (such as depth, and the number, size and connectivity of chambers) reflects selective pressures for different functions, or structural constraints that are imposed by the environment or evolutionary history. To determine potential drivers of nest structure variation in subterranean nests, we performed a meta-analysis of measures of published ant nests to compare different structural elements within and across species. We complemented this survey with 42 nest casts of two closely related species. We quantified nest features that can potentially impact ant foraging behaviour and examined whether phylogeny or foraging strategy are better explanatory variables for the variation we observed. We found that foraging strategy better explained nest features than evolutionary history. Our work reveals the importance of ecology in shaping nest structure and provides an important foundation for future investigations into the selective pressures that have shaped ant nest architecture. This article is part of the theme issue 'The evolutionary ecology of nests: a cross-taxon approach'.

Indexed as

AntsAnimalsEcologyNesting Behaviorant ecologyforaging behaviournest architecturephylogeny

Identifiers

PMID37427470
PMCPMC10331909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.