Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37427466›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023

The evolution of nest site use and nest architecture in modern birds and their ancestors.

Mark C Mainwaring, Iliana Medina, Bret W Tobalske, Ian R Hartley, David J Varricchio, Mark E Hauber

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The evolutionary ecology of nests: a cross-taxon approach.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Mark C MainwaringSchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2DG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0427-9673
Iliana MedinaSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1021-5035
Bret W TobalskeField Research Station at Fort Missoula, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, MT 59802, USA.
Ian R HartleyLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7592-3921
David J VarricchioDepartment of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.
Mark E HauberDepartment of Evolution, Ecology, and Behavior, School of Integrative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2014-4928
Bangor University · GBLancaster University · GBMontana State University · USThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Montana · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of nest site use and nest architecture in the non-avian ancestors of birds remains poorly understood because nest structures do not preserve well as fossils. Nevertheless, the evidence suggests that the earliest dinosaurs probably buried eggs below ground and covered them with soil so that heat from the substrate fuelled embryo development, while some later dinosaurs laid partially exposed clutches where adults incubated them and protected them from predators and parasites. The nests of euornithine birds-the precursors to modern birds-were probably partially open and the neornithine birds-or modern birds-were probably the first to build fully exposed nests. The shift towards smaller, open cup nests has been accompanied by shifts in reproductive traits, with female birds having one functioning ovary in contrast to the two ovaries of crocodilians and many non-avian dinosaurs. The evolutionary trend among extant birds and their ancestors has been toward the evolution of greater cognitive abilities to construct in a wider diversity of sites and providing more care for significantly fewer, increasingly altricial, offspring. The highly derived passerines reflect this pattern with many species building small, architecturally complex nests in open sites and investing significant care into altricial young. This article is part of the theme issue 'The evolutionary ecology of nests: a cross-taxon approach'.

Indexed as

DinosaursParasitesAnimalsBiological EvolutionEcologyFemaleNesting BehaviorReproductionbirdscrocodiliansdinosaursevolutionnest architecturenest sites

Identifiers

PMID37427466
PMCPMC10331912
OpenAlexW4383711206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.