Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37427465›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023

Long-term environmental stability does not erode plasticity in nest building responses to changing ambient conditions.

Meng-Han Joseph Chung, Iain Barber, Megan L Head

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Long-term environmental stability does not erode plasticity in nest building responses to changing ambient conditions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Bird nest building: visions for the future.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. The evolutionary ecology of nests: a cross-taxon approach.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Meng-Han Joseph ChungDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, 2601, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9214-1190
Iain BarberDepartment of Life Sciences, Aberystwyth University, SY23 3DA, Aberystwyth, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3955-6674
Megan L HeadDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, 2601, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8123-7661
Australian National University · AUAberystwyth University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary function of animal nests is to protect developing offspring from hostile and fluctuating environments. Animal builders have been shown to adjust nest construction in response to changes in their environment. However, the extent of this plasticity, and its dependence on an evolutionary history of environmental variability, is not well understood. To test whether an evolutionary history with flowing water impacts male ability to adjust nests in response to flow regime, we collected three-spined sticklebacks (

Indexed as

SmegmamorphaAnimalsClimate ChangeMaleNesting BehaviorWaterWateranimal constructionenvironmental-dependencenest buildingparental carephenotypic plasticitystickleback

Identifiers

PMID37427465
PMCPMC10331907
OpenAlexW4383710908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.