ArticleOncology letters2023
Dosimetric comparison of four radiotherapy techniques for stage III non‑small cell lung cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative evaluation of the effect of anatomical changes on the results of in vivo dosimetry during radiation therapy in the thoracic region.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Four-dimensional computed tomography ventilation imaging-guided radiotherapy planning in different techniques for lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: advances following the introduction of PET-CT and IMRT/VMAT.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025Article
- PlanAct: An eclipse scripting API-based module embedding clinical optimization strategies for automated planning in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Dosimetric comparison of gamma knife and linear accelerator (VMAT and IMRT) plans of SBRT of Lung tumours.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Dosimetric comparison of five different radiotherapy treatment planning approaches for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer with sequential plan changes.Thoracic cancer · 2023Article
- Comparison of photon intensity modulated, hybrid and volumetric modulated arc radiation treatment techniques in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study was implemented to compare the dosimetric parameters of the target dose coverage and critical structures in the treatment planning of four radiotherapy techniques [namely, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), hybrid IMRT (h-IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT)] for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) qualified plans for medical physicists, therapists and physicians. A total of 40 patients confirmed to have stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC were enrolled, and four plans were designed for each patient. The prescription dose to the planning target volume (PTV) was assigned as 60 Gy in 30 fractions. The conformity index (CI), heterogeneity index (HI) and parameters of organs at risk (OARs) were calculated. For the PTV, the CI for VMAT was found to be the highest of all the four techniques (P<0.05), whereas the HI for the h-IMRT technique was found to be the lowest (P<0.05). Concerning the OARs, for the percentage of lung volume receiving a dose >5 Gy (lung V
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.