ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2023
Assessment of rational use of antimicrobials: a cross-sectional study among people of Nepal.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review on Evaluation of WHO Core Prescribing Indicators Across Healthcare Facilities in Low Resource Asian Setting: A Case of Nepal.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingPooled it
- Understanding and Practice of AWaRe Among Healthcare Professionals in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Nepal; Implications for Antimicrobial Resistance: A Comparative Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Drivers of antimicrobial resistance within the communities of Nepal from One Health perspective: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Exploratory analysis of the knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of healthcare workers about arboviruses in the context of surveillance in the Republic of Guinea.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inappropriate antimicrobial use leading to antimicrobial resistance is a matter of public health concern globally. This research was conducted with the objective of preventing antimicrobial misuse across knowledge, behavior, and practice domains among the general people of Nepal. Methods: It was a cross-sectional survey conducted among 385 participants visiting tertiary care center from all over Nepal from February 2022 to May 2022. Modified Bloom's cut-off point was utilized to categorize the participants' overall knowledge, behavior, and practice. The chi-square ( Results: More than three-fifths of the participants (248, 64.42%) demonstrated good behavior, whereas less than half of the participants showed good knowledge (137, 35.58%) and practice (161, 41.82%) about rational use of antimicrobials. Health professionals had higher knowledge (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.70-1.62) and good behavior (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.27-0.64) than other professionals ( Conclusions: The findings imply the demand for effective legislature, strict enforcement of the drug act, and proper implementation of plans and policies to curb antimicrobials misuse. Lack of execution of existing laws and the unawareness of the public led to the extravagant use of antimicrobials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.