ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Deep convolutional neural networks for multiple histologic types of ovarian tumors classification in ultrasound images.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of ovarian cancer using convolutional neural network: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Applied to Ultrasound Diagnosis of Pelvic Gynecological Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Gynecologic and obstetric investigation · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for ovarian cancer diagnosis via ultrasound: a systematic review and quantitative assessment of model performance.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence potential in ovarian endometriosis imaging: a comparative meta-analysis of transvaginal ultrasound-based AI models and human readers.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- A multicenter deep learning framework integrating radiomics and vision transformers for comprehensive ovarian tumor analysis from ultrasound imaging.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- A cross-validated deep learning framework for automated detection of DMBA-induced ovarian cancer from histopathological images with CA-125 biomarker support.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Ultrasound-Based Diagnoses of Gynecological Tumors: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Early-fusion hybrid CNN-transformer models for multiclass ovarian tumor ultrasound classification.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Deep fine-KNN classification of ovarian cancer subtypes using efficientNet-B0 extracted features: a comprehensive analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Ultrasound radiomics-based artificial intelligence model to assist in the differential diagnosis of ovarian endometrioma and ovarian dermoid cyst.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and validate the performance of deep convolutional neural networks when discriminating different histologic types of ovarian tumor in ultrasound (US) images. Material and methods: Our retrospective study took 1142 US images from 328 patients from January 2019 to June 2021. Two tasks were proposed based on US images. Task 1 was to classify benign and high-grade serous carcinoma in original ovarian tumor US images, in which benign ovarian tumor was divided into six classes: mature cystic teratoma, endometriotic cyst, serous cystadenoma, granulosa-theca cell tumor, mucinous cystadenoma and simple cyst. The US images in task 2 were segmented. Deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) were applied to classify different types of ovarian tumors in detail. We used transfer learning on six pre-trained DCNNs: VGG16, GoogleNet, ResNet34, ResNext50, DensNet121 and DensNet201. Several metrics were adopted to assess the model performance: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, FI-score and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The DCNN performed better in labeled US images than in original US images. The best predictive performance came from the ResNext50 model. The model had an overall accuracy of 0.952 for in directly classifying the seven histologic types of ovarian tumors. It achieved a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 99.2% for high-grade serous carcinoma, and a sensitivity of over 90% and a specificity of over 95% in most benign pathological categories. Conclusion: DCNN is a promising technique for classifying different histologic types of ovarian tumors in US images, and provide valuable computer-aided information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.