Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37427087›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2023

Does a robot's gaze aversion affect human gaze aversion?

Chinmaya Mishra, Tom Offrede, Susanne Fuchs, Christine Mooshammer, Gabriel Skantze

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chinmaya MishraFurhat Robotics AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tom OffredeHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Susanne FuchsLeibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS), Berlin, Germany.
Christine MooshammerHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Gabriel SkantzeFurhat Robotics AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
CBot (Sweden) · SEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DELeibniz-Centre General Linguistics · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gaze cues serve an important role in facilitating human conversations and are generally considered to be one of the most important non-verbal cues. Gaze cues are used to manage turn-taking, coordinate joint attention, regulate intimacy, and signal cognitive effort. In particular, it is well established that gaze aversion is used in conversations to avoid prolonged periods of mutual gaze. Given the numerous functions of gaze cues, there has been extensive work on modelling these cues in social robots. Researchers have also tried to identify the impact of robot gaze on human participants. However, the influence of robot gaze behavior on human gaze behavior has been less explored. We conducted a within-subjects user study (N = 33) to verify if a robot's gaze aversion influenced human gaze aversion behavior. Our results show that participants tend to avert their gaze more when the robot keeps staring at them as compared to when the robot exhibits well-timed gaze aversions. We interpret our findings in terms of intimacy regulation: humans try to compensate for the robot's lack of gaze aversion.

Indexed as

gazegaze aversiongaze behaviorgaze control modelhuman-robot interactionintimacysocial robottopic intimacy

Identifiers

PMID37427087
PMCPMC10326846
OpenAlexW4381929535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.