Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37427002›Full record

ReviewHCA healthcare journal of medicine2021

What External Variables Affect Sensorimotor Rhythm Brain-Computer Interface (SMR-BCI) Performance?

Alex J Horowitz, Christoph Guger, Milena Korostenskaja

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in HCA healthcare journal of medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Brain-computer interface: an update for the clinicians.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alex J HorowitzFunctional Brain Mapping and Brain Computer Interface Lab, Neuroscience Institute, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, FL, USA.
Christoph Gugerg.tec Medical Engineering GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Milena KorostenskajaFunctional Brain Mapping and Brain Computer Interface Lab, Neuroscience Institute, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, FL, USA.
AdventHealth Orlando · USGuger Technologies (Austria) · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Description Sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interfaces (SMR-BCIs) are used for the acquisition and translation of motor imagery-related brain signals into machine control commands, bypassing the usual central nervous system output. The selection of optimal external variable configuration can maximize SMR-BCI performance in both healthy and disabled people. This performance is especially important now when the BCI is targeted for everyday use in the environment beyond strictly regulated laboratory settings. In this review article, we summarize and critically evaluate the current body of knowledge pertaining to the effect of the external variables on SMR-BCI performance. When assessing the relationship between SMR-BCI performance and external variables, we broadly characterize them as elements that are less dependent on the BCI user and originate from beyond the user. These elements include such factors as BCI type, distractors, training, visual and auditory feedback, virtual reality and magneto electric feedback, proprioceptive and haptic feedback, carefulness of electroencephalography (EEG) system assembling and positioning of EEG electrodes as well as recording-related artifacts. At the end of this review paper, future developments are proposed regarding the research into the effects of external variables on SMR-BCI performance. We believe that our critical review will be of value for academic BCI scientists and developers and clinical professionals working in the field of BCIs as well as for SMR-BCI users.

Indexed as

adoption ratesauditory feedbackBCI accuracyBCI literacyBCI optimizationBCI performancebrain-computer interfaces (BCIs)classification accuracydistractorsdrone controldry electrodesEEG artifactsEEG waveformselectrocorticography (ECoG)electroencephalography (EEG)event-related potentialsexoskeletonexternal factorsexternal variableshaptic feedbackinformation transfer rate (ITR)internal factorsinternal variablesmagnetoencephalography (MEG)motor imagerymotor imagery trainingmultimodal feedbackneurophysiologyneuroprostheticsodd-ball paradigmP300 responserepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)sensorimotor rhythm (SMR)sensory feedbacksteady-state somatosensory evoked potential (SSSEP)steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs)transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)vibrotactile feedbackvirtual reality (VR)visual feedback

Identifiers

PMID37427002
PMCPMC10324824
OpenAlexW3176760696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.