Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37426912›Full record

ReviewJSES international2023

Functional outcomes after reverse shoulder megaprosthesis following resection of malignant bone tumor in the proximal humerus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jorinde J P M Denissen, Niek Koenders, Gerben van Hinte, Femke Groen, Philip J van der Wees, Ingrid C M van der Geest, Edwin F Dierselhuis

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JSES international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07337018 (Valutazione Resezioni Oncologiche e Ricostruzione Con Utilizzo di Impianti Protesici in Chirurgia Oncologica Ortopedica), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07337018 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Valutazione Resezioni Oncologiche e Ricostruzione Con Utilizzo di Impianti Protesici in Chirurgia Oncologica Ortopedica (Evaluation of Oncologic Resections and Reconstruction Using Prosthetic Implants in Orthopedic Oncologic Surgery)

TypeobservationalSponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRan2026 to 2028Enrolled100ConditionsBone Tumor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jorinde J P M DenissenDepartment of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Niek KoendersDepartment of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gerben van HinteDepartment of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Femke GroenResearch Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Expertise Center Healthy Urban Living, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Philip J van der WeesRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ingrid C M van der GeestDepartment of Orthopaedics, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Edwin F DierselhuisDepartment of Orthopaedics, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After resection of tumors in the proximal humerus, orthopedic oncologic surgeons are able to restore the shoulder function of patients with reverse shoulder megaprosthesis. Information about expected postoperative physical functioning is required to guide patient expectations, identify abnormal recovery, and set treatment goals. The aim was to provide an overview of functional outcomes after reverse shoulder megaprosthesis in patients after proximal humerus resection. This systematic review searched studies in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase up to March 2022. Data on performance-based and patient-reported functional outcomes were extracted using standardized data extraction files. A meta-analysis with random effects model was performed to estimate outcomes after 2-year follow-up. The search identified 1089 studies. Nine studies were included in the qualitative analysis and six in the meta-analysis. Forward flexion range of motion (ROM) after 2 years was 105 degrees (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 88-122, n = 59), abduction ROM 105 degrees (95% CI: 96-115, n = 29), and external rotation ROM 26 degrees (95% CI: 1-51, n = 48). The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score after 2 years was 67 points (95% CI: 48-86, n = 42), mean Constant-Murley-Score 63 (95% CI: 62-64, n = 36), and mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score 78 (95% CI: 66-91, n = 56). The meta-analysis shows acceptable functional outcomes 2 years after reverse shoulder megaprosthesis. However, outcomes may well differ between patients as reflected by the CIs. Further research should focus on modifiable factors associated with impaired functional outcomes.

Indexed as

Bone metastasesBone tumorFunctional outcomeLimb salvageProximal humerusReverse shoulder megaprosthesis

Identifiers

PMID37426912
PMCPMC10328784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.