ArticleHeliyon2023
Understanding students' self-regulated learning and anxiety in online English courses in higher education.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of achievement emotions on learning performance in online learning context: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Development of a blended MOOC implementation model for English language learning: An interpretive structural modeling approach.PloS one · 2026Article
- Online self-regulated English learning and English learning anxiety in digital contexts: the mediating role of intrinsic motivation.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Association Between Anxiety Disorders and English Academic Writing Performance Among College Students: The Chain Mediating Role of Learning Motivation and Metacognitive Strategies.Psychology research and behavior management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is presently little known about students' use of SRL strategies and anxiety levels and the effects on learning outcomes overall and for specific skills in fully synchronous online English classes. Thus, this study explored 171 first-year non-English major students at an autonomous university in Thailand who had completed their first fully online courses for 12 weeks taught by foreign English lecturers. As measures, online self-regulated learning, students' anxiety in English learning, and course outcomes were employed by means of a mixed-method design. The findings revealed students' high use of SRL strategies and their significant contribution to their online learning outcomes. Nevertheless, students' anxiety levels were not a significant predictor of learning outcomes and could not dictate SRL strategies in online classes. These findings occurred among female and male students equally. This study observed an instrumental role of SRL strategies in students' online accomplishments in their first online learning experience. In conclusion, the current research highlights the crucial role of SRL strategies in online English language learning and provides valuable insights for language educators in designing effective pedagogical interventions. It suggests that SRL is not only important for achieving learning outcomes but also requires continuous monitoring and support from teachers and peers. Additionally, the study indicates that gender differences in SRL may not be significant in the context of synchronous online English classes. These findings have significant implications for the development of effective pedagogical practices for online language learning and underscore the need for further research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.